Answer:
The New England colonies were flat along the rocky coastline, which made good harbors. It became hilly and mountainous further inland. The land was covered in dense forests. The soil was rocky, which made farming difficult.
Middle colonies geography ranged from coastal plains along the coastline, piedmont (rolling hills) in the middle, and mountains farther inland.
The southern colonies were made up of mostly coastal plains and piedmont areas. The soil was good for farming and the climate was warm, including hot summers and mild winters. The growing season here was longer than any other region. The southern colonies' economy was based on agriculture (farming).
Explanation:
"Aggressor" is a fairly political and loose term. I believe they were both proportionally bad in the situation. However since you are likely looking for an argument for one side, I suppose I would have to go with the USSR. They started the Berlin blockade which both violated treaties and nearly led to a large war. At the time in Russia, if anyone disagreed with their secular agenda or government they would be exiled. I think it's important though to again point out that contrary to popular belief, both sides got into unwanted wars and did aggressive things during the time and neither should be dubbed the only "aggressor"
The problem starts already earlier:wildlife experts can only estimate the number of species in the world generally!
This is the case because there are simply too many species, and it takes time to documents them; because some areas (ocean bottom for example) are very hard to access and because sometimes it's hard to know whether we're talking about a new species or a variation within the same species.
so if we even don't know how many species there are, it's even harder to know how many are endangered.
Answer:
YES I DO believe thats y im never taking my mask off when im out the house
Explanation:
<h2>MARK ME BRAINLIEST PLZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZz</h2>
