Answer:
i cant see the question i helped plz.......
Explanation:
Scarcity is the fundamental challenge that all individuals and nations must confront. Everyone faces some limitations, so we all have to make choices where we limit or allow ourselves to something.
Economists generally recognize four types of economic systems traditional, traditional, command, market and mixed.
A traditional economic system is shaped by tradition. The work that people do, the goods and services they provide, how they exchange resources… all tend to follow a pattern. The traditional system is bad at addressing scarcity because scarcity is formed off of new requirements people have through the ages and a traditional system would not evolve just as our requirements would.
In a planned economy, the government controls the economy. The state decides how to use and distribute resources. The government regulates prices and wages; it may even determine what sorts of work individuals do.
Socialism is a prime example of a planned economy. Socialism does not work because it is not consistent with the fundamental principles of human behavior. The failure of socialism in countries around the world can be traced to one critical defect: it is a system that ignores incentives.
Market economies allow all economic decisions to be made by individuals. The unrestrained interactions between individuals and companies in the marketplace determine what happens to all the good and resources.Individuals choose how to invest their personal resources and individuals decide what to consume. Within a pure market economy, the government is entirely absent from economic affairs.
A mixed economic system combines elements of the market and command economy. Many economic decisions are made in the market by individuals. But the government also plays a role in the allocation and distribution of resources.
If scarcity is looked at on a macro level, the best economic system is mixed because it allows the government to also plays a role in the allocation and distribution of resources, while the individuals still stay happy because they have some control. The only problem is the eternal question of what the right mix between the public and private sectors of the economy should be.
There is no point to look at it on a micro level because almost no country is small enough to be considered on that level.
Answer:
Thousands of Jewish children survived this brutal carnage, however, many because they were hidden. With identities disguised, and often physically concealed from the outside world, these youngsters faced constant fear, dilemmas, and danger. Theirs was a life in shadows, where a careless remark, a denunciation, or the murmurings of inquisitive neighbors could lead to discovery and death. The Nazis advocated killing children of “unwanted” or “dangerous” groups either as part of the “racial struggle” or as a measure of preventative security. The Germans and their collaborators killed children for these ideological reasons and in retaliation for real or alleged partisan attacks.
Explanation:
Answer:
economy, modernized
Explanation:
The cause of Franco-Prussian War can be attributed to the events that surrounds German unification. After the Austro-Prussian War in 1866,Prussia has gotten alot of German territories and they formed the North German Confederation along with some German territories.Southern German states strongly opposed France with their annexation. One the
disruptive nation builders in France was Napoleon III, who was a nephew to Napoleon I, he was the France's first president, and reigned from year 1848 to 1852, he was also the last monarch in French monarch from year 1852 to 1870.
Some of the changes that was brought to France by Napoleon III are; the promotion of the building of the Suez Canal , he also bought about the establishment of modern agriculture, which brought an end to famines in France, and turned France to an agricultural exporter country. He negotiated the agreement of Cobden–Chevalier free trade in 1860 ,with Britain and other partners in European countries. It should be noted that the first of the disruptive nation builders was Napoleon III. He set out to create a lavish court, boost the economy, build railroads, and otherwise modernized France.
The correct answer to this open question was the following.
The difference in the perspectives of Americans and Cubans in regards to the Battle of San Juan Hill is that the Cubans were tired of the Spanish monarchy presence in the Island of Cuba, but had no means to get rid of the Spaniards and its powerful army. The American point of view was that the United States had the exclusive right to intervene and take care of the issues in the American continent, not the Europeans, that is why the First US Voluntary Cavalry, led by Theodore Roosevelt, tried to recapture Santiago de Cuba. To accomplish this, they had to fight a severe resistance in the Battle of San Juan Hill on July 1, 1898.
