Answer:
Both (B) and (C) are correct
Step-by-step explanation:
Explaining in simple terms, The Simpson's paradox simply describes a phenomenon which occurs when observable trends in a relationship, which are obvious during singular evaluation of the variables disappears when each of this relationships are combined. This is what played out when hitmire appears to d well on both of natyraknamd artificial turf when separately compared, but isn't the same when the turf data was combined. Also, performance may actually not be related to the turf as turf may Just be. a lurking variable causing a spurious association in performance.
six
Step-by-step explanation:
the reason is this: let steak be (s), pork be (p), grilled chicken be (gc), tea be (t), and coffee be (c)
now, we want to find the total number of outcomes, and this cannot be determined by a simple roll of the dice. you have to count the sample space required for EVERY outcome, and it has to lie within the conditions. so, assuming David only takes 1 main course and 1 drink, he would be down to six option, which are :
1. s & t
2. s & c
3. p & t
4. p & c
5. gc & t
6. gc & c
3x * 3x = 9x
9x + 6 - 2x + 5x - 4x^2 + 9
9x + 6 - 7x - 4x * 4x + 9
9x + 6 - 7x - 16x + 9
9x + -7x = 2x + 6 - 16x + 9
2x + 6 - 16x + 9
2x + (-3) - 16x
-14x + (-3) is the expression?
Answer:
uh depends on the equations
