Answer:
i dont know it depends in
your school or university
but alway check you school
group.ch.at
Explanation:
that i know
kamsahamnida
Answer:
This is because scientists can only really guess how the earth started and got to this point. Even with evidence like fossils, etc. they still don't have clear answers for what really happened, and they still have no clue how the Earth was created in the first place, so that's why evolution is a theory. They know how gravity works so it is called a law. hope this helped! good luck! (:
Answer:
1) my aunt never treated me well when I lived with her
2) my bf is really understanding and supportive
3) my mom took me back earlier this year
Explanation:
1) it made me stronger
2) he is a really important person to me and helps me feel better when Im down
3) my mom taking me back led to positivity in my life
The correct answer is C. The two authors are in awe of nature; their experiences reveal that time in nature can change people.
Explanation:
In grammar, the punctuation of a sentence mainly depends on the different components that are part of it and the way these relate, in the case of the sentence presented, this sentence contains two main ideas "The two authors are in awe of nature" and "their experiences reveal that time in nature can change people" which makes necessary to place a punctuation mark between both, considering both ideas express a complete thought and do not depend on the other to stand, this punctuation mark should be a semicolon (;) as one of the uses of semicolon is to separate complete or independent sentences. Additionally, these sentences are short and each simple sentences and therefore any other punctuation mark is required, this makes option C "The two authors are in awe of nature; their experiences reveal that time in nature can change people" the sentence that is punctuated correctly.
The correct answer is, "Mark Antony repeats that line to discredit Brutus by giving examples that prove that Caesar was not ambitious."
Anthony uses irony to point out that Caesar was not ambitious, despite Brutus saying he was. To better explain the excerpt, I summarized it in three parts:
- Anthony states, "Brutus says Caesar was ambitious."
- Anthony states that Brutus is an honorable man.
- Anthony states reasons why Caesar was not ambitious, which contradicts the two previous statements.
