Answer:
The delegates for a strong national government believed that a strong national government would endanger the rights of states. The delegates for stronger state governments believed that a strong national government would threaten individual liberty.
Explanation:
Hope it helps:)
brainlest plzz
The Union blockade of the Southern ports was part of General Scott's Anaconda Plan.
The Anaconda plan involved choking off the Southern supply of goods via a port blockage in tandem with the Union Army coming up, around, and down the Mississippi River and working through the south systemically.
Both independence movements (Vietnam and Algeria) was launched and organized a communist or a nationalist’s party to fight in the battle. When the war was successfully ended and gaining their victory they proclaimed their independence and grabbed their democracy that made all the communists united.
<span>Prior to the conclusion of the Seven Years War there was little, if any, reason to believe that one day the American colonies would undertake a revolution in an effort to create an independent nation-state. As apart of the empire the colonies were protected from foreign invasion by the British military. In return, the colonists paid relatively few taxes and could engage in domestic economic activity without much interference from the British government. For the most part the colonists were only asked to adhere to regulations concerning foreign trade. In a series of acts passed by Parliament during the seventeenth century the Navigation Acts required that all trade within the empire be conducted on ships which were constructed, owned and largely manned by British citizens. Certain enumerated goods whether exported or imported by the colonies had to be shipped through England regardless of the final port of destination.</span>
Explanation:
1. I <u>agree </u>with the Sitting Bull's quote. It makes me feel a bit upset, Sitting Bull conveyed great emotion within the 8 sentence that are there.
2. I do <u>not </u>think western settlers could have coexisted with tribes they encountered due to how persistent Sitting Bull was for fighting for the Native American's freedom from the Western Settlers.
3. I do <u>not </u>think Native Americans should have been put on reservations. The Native Americans were there before the Western Settlers were, this is their land.
4. No, I do <u>not </u>think Native Americans should have adapted to settler ways. Native Americans have their own culture which the settlers should not intervene with.
5. The settlers and federal government was <u>not</u> within their rights to conquer Native Americans and take their homelands. The Native Americans have their own rights just as much the settlers did. The homelands were where they lived. They were not above the Native Americans.