If Austin can produce potato chips at a lower opportunity cost than William, then Austin has a comparative advantage in the production of potato chips.
Comparative advantage refers to a situation in which an individual, business or country can produce a good or service at a lower opportunity cost than another producers or businesses.
In production a lower opportunity cost creates a comparative advantage. So here in this situation a comparative advantage in one good implies a comparative disadvantage in another.
Hence, comparative advantage is the ability of a producer to produce a good or service for a lower opportunity cost than its competitor.
To learn more about comparative advantage here:
brainly.com/question/28238063
#SPJ4
Answer:
1. Annual demand ( D) = 100,000 bags
Ordering cost per order (Co) = $15
Holding cost per item per annum (H) = 15% x $2 = $0.30
EOQ = √<u>2DCo</u>
H
EOQ = √<u>2 x 100,000 x $15</u>
0.30
EOQ = 3,162 units
2. Maximum inventory
= Safety stock + EOQ
= 1,500 + 3,162
= 4,662 units
3. Average inventory
= EOQ/2
= <u>3,162</u>
2
= 1,581 units
4. Number of order
= <u>Annual demand</u>
EOQ
= <u>100,000</u>
3,162
= 32 times
Explanation:
EOQ is the square root of 2 multiplied by annual demand and ordering cost per order divided by holding cost per item per annum.
Maximum inventory is the aggregate of safety stock and EOQ.
Average inventory is economic order quantity divided by 2
Number of order is the ratio of annual demand to economic order quantity.
Answer:
M3 (Broad Money)
M3 = M1 + Time deposits with commercial banks (Fixed deposits, Recurring deposits). MIND IT: M3= M1+time and NOT M3=M2+time.
Answer:
The correct option is C,when there is a fixed price contract
Explanation:
Bottom up estimating is a project management cost technique where the workers who are to work on the project make inputs in cost computation of the project.
Since the contract price of the project is fixed, the task left is for the agreed fee to be broken down into different areas of the project in order to determine the high cost and low cost areas in order that the cost attributed to a particular area of the project can be seen to be justified
