Answer:
King Charles IX ordered the murder of Huguenot Protestant leaders after the failed assassination attempt by his mother
Explanation:
So, King Charles of France was influenced by his mother, Catherine de Medici to have the leaders of the Huguenots killed in order to "stop a rebellion" after her failed attempt to have Admiral Gaspard de Coligny killed. Charles was trying to apease the Huguenots upset by promising to have the assassination attempt investiagated, when his mother told him the Huguenots were on the brink of rebellion to derail investigations. Charles gave the go-ahead for the murder of the leaders which were all gathered in Paris for a wedding and the bloodshed began. Catholic Parisans attacked the Huguenots and even when a order from the King to stop the bloodshed was issued, it fell on deaf ears. Over 70,000 Huguenots were killed throughout France and it is mainly regarded as the revival of the relgious civil war of France.
Hope this helps
C.) a stone pyramid was an example of bronze age of <span>architectural innovation</span><span />
The merchants cover the vast area of the Silk Road in the large caravans.
<h3>What was the Silk Route?</h3>
Silk Route refers to the path through which the silk was carried from China to Western world and many regions of Asia. It was conducted at the time of the medieval ages between the Roman Empire and China.
Large caravans carried traders and merchants. They would be accompanied by numerous guards.
Defending against bandits was made easier when traveling in a large group like a caravan. Because a large portion of the road passed through desolate, difficult terrain, camels were frequently used as transportation.
Learn about Silk route here:
brainly.com/question/16243985\
#SPJ1
A. at St Louis ,Missouri River, Columbia river ,Pacific Ocean
Answer:
The National Party was elected in 1948 on the policy of Apartheid ('separateness'). This 'separateness' put South Africans of different racial groups on their own paths in a partitioned system of development.
Explanation:
<h3>Effects of the Group Areas Act</h3>
The GAA had strange implications for governance and responsibility as it became more elaborate and amended. For example, the Coloured townships of Coronationville, Noordgesig, Newclare, Riverlea, and Western Township are administrated by Johannesburg City Council while Bosmont is the responsibility of the Department of Community Development (South African Institute of Race Relations, 1964: 216). The work of welfare organizations was made more difficult by the GAA, like Lunalegwaba House, a group home for African boys, in Johannesburg could not operate because the regulations of the GAA did not allow the White charity to own the property (South African Institute for Race Relations, 1967: 306). People attempted to use the courts to overturn the GAA, though each time they were unsuccessful (Dugard, 1978, 324). Others decided to use civil disobedience and other protests, like ‘sit-ins’ at restaurants, were experienced across South Africa in the early 60s. The 'sit-ins' were not ill-received by the average White citizen, which the South African Institute of Race Relations believed proved that they did not object to sharing restaurants with the other racial groups (1961: 183). There was also resistance from Cape Town City Council who voted before 1964 to keep District Six and the central business district not dedicated to any one racial group; they had the support of the Cape Town Chamber of Commerce on this decision (South African Institute of Race Relations, 1964: 213).
