Answer:
This is really a personal opinion, since whether it is correct to send people to mars or not depends largely on your point of view and personal beliefs. Clearly, humans are far more capable than robots, and they can explore space and eventually other planets much better than a rover. On the other hand, sending people to Mars is not only extremely expensive, but it is also extremely dangerous for the astronauts themselves.
Imagine so many people died trying to get to space and then to the moon, and that was very easy compared to getting to Mars and back.
We can find millions of better ways to use the money than sending people to space, and that is really hard to argue against. Our planet, our country, state or even city could all benefit and use the money more productively.
But lets say that we do not care about the money because Mr. Bezos or some other billionaire decided to donate it. Now we would face the technical issues of going to Mars and actually staying there for a long time. A trip to mars is not something that would be carried out for just a couple of hours (like moon walking). Astronauts will have to stay in Mars for weeks, months or even years before they can return. This results in an extreme danger to their health due to cosmic rays. Can humans survive long term exposure to cosmic rays? The answer is NO and Mars's atmosphere doesn't help.
If we analyze this situation from a technical point of view, it would be better and safer to send astronauts to Titan (Saturn's moon), and would probably be also more useful. Titan's environment is similar to Earth's in many ways, and if we are actually doing it for a scientific purpose besides simply being curious, then it is much more useful to go to Titan. The scientific purpose of going to mars instead of other possible destinations is not very solid. Mars is really different to Earth and unless someone finds Martians living there, there is not much you can do.
Answer:
$503
Explanation:
The computation of the adjusted cash balance is shown below:
As we know that
Adjusted cash balance is = Cash ending balance - NSF Checks - Service charge
= $660 - $130 - $27
= $503
And we do not considered the other two items as they are not impact the cash balance
Basically we applied the above formula
If a monopsonist offers a wage of $6, he finds that 1,200 people are willing to work for him. This means that the: a marginal factor cost is $6.
<h3>Monopsonist</h3>
If a monopsonist offers a wage of $6, he finds that 1.200 people are willing to work for him. This means that the O a. total wage cost is $1,200. b. marginal factor cost is $6. O c. total wage cost is $7.200. o d. $6 wage is too high. o e marginal factor cost is $200.
Learn more about monopsonist here :
brainly.com/question/27750664
#SPJ4
Answer:
The correct answer is E
Explanation:
Marketing is the procedure or the process of interesting the potential customers or consumers as well as the clients in products or services. In short, it is the procedure which involves distributing, promoting, selling and researching the services or the products.
Therefore, the marketing is the set of institutions, activity and the processes for communicating, delivering and creating that value for the clients, society and customers at huge.