Answer: The correct answer is "E. Cost of goods sold to be overstated and net income to be understated.".
Explanation: The understatement of the ending inventory balance causes:
<u>Cost of goods sold to be overstated and net income to be understated.</u>
Answer:Share premium account of $24,000
The provider of attorney services of $30,000
Explanation:
On provision of services, the Attorney services expenses account is debited with $54,000 and the attorney services provider account credited with $54,000
Furthermore a share account is opened for the provider and credited with $30,000 , the share premium is credited $24,000 and a debit transfer is made to his liability account initially credited.
The $24,000 credit to share premium represents the difference between the nominal value of the share of $5 and the market value of $9 multiply by the 30,000 shares he was paid with.
Also a memorandum will be issued to state that 6000 share has been transferred from Miller to the attorney services provider and the shares will be delited from his name and entered in the name of the services provider because the credit of shares to his account does not represents new shares issued but it's the transfer of Miller's shares to him.
The government began to print more money. The increase in the ‘money supply’ which happens faster than the economic growth leads to inflation. When the government prints more money then it brings down the value of the money in the market.
Answer
A detailed statement of receipts and expenditure for a period of time in the future is called a Budget
Explanation
An estimate of revenue and expenses over a particular future period of time is referred as the budget. A budget can be made for a family, for an individual or a business entity. In companies, budget is utilized as an internal tool of management.
This would indeed present a conflict of interest. A conflict of interest occurs when a person or an organization is involved in various commitments, obligations or tasks, and where serving one interest could involve working against the other. In this case, the law firm that represents the tug boat manufacturer has as its goal the maintenance of objectivity and the pursuit of justice. However, if the son of the canal administrator joins the firm, this could be put at jeopardy, as he would have a vested interest in a particular outcome.
