Answer:
a)$16,894
Explanation:
The computation of his income is shown below:
= Wages + allocated tips for box 7 + tips that do not reported
= $16,400 + $350 + $144
= $16,894
We simply added the Wages, allocated tips for box 7, and tips that do not reported so that the exact value could come
All other information which is given is not relevant. Hence, ignored it
The cengage learning for the mitigation is the difference between the agreed upon $72000 less what was earned from the $25000 position that barton managed to obtain
<u>Explanation</u>:
Mitigation of damages:
In the case of barton v. vanhorn a court would consider barton's attempts at findings similar employment a reasonable step in mitigating her damages.
Under the doctrine of damage mitigation, a wrongfully terminated employee must look for other compartable employment, and subtract whatever you make from that job from what you request in damages.
Damages in the case would be the difference between the agreed upon $72000 less what was earned from the $25000 position that barton managed to obtain.
Answer:
b. Place the company on a restricted list and give only factual information about the company.
Explanation:
There is an ethical problem in the scenario that borders on professional code of conducts in the area of objectivity and independence.
It was stated in the scenario that ''the head of the investment banking department has asked the head of the brokerage unit <u>to change the recommendation from "sell" to "buy."</u>
This is a case of wanting to interfere with the <u>objectivity</u> of the recommendations which should be based on <u>facts not bias</u>.
Secondly, the head of investment banking is trying to interfere with the <u>independence</u> of the head of brokerage unit.
According to the Standards, the head of the brokerage unit would be permitted to place the company on a restricted list and <u>give only factual information</u> about the company.
This problem is simply straight forward. The total rate of
return is simply the sum of the real rate of return and the inflation rate,
that is:
77% = 33% + Inflation Rate
Therefore inflation is:
Inflation Rate = 77% - 33%
<span>Inflation Rate = 44%</span>
Answer:
The closing that best expresses a desire to satisfy the customer and signals confidence that the problem has been resolved is:
b. Thanks again for writing. Your satisfaction is our utmost goal. We hope that the new bag will help you get over your disappointment and the inconvenience of buying a defective product. As I said before, such flaws are extremely rare.
Explanation:
The closing of 'a' in this case sounds unbusinesslike, to say the least. It is very much unlike the closing of 'b' which is very apt. The customer should never be made to appear to be at fault for patronizing our products. The customer's satisfaction should be the utmost guide for maintaining correct customer services. Trying to attribute a product's fault to a customer is totally wrong and sounds unprofessional. Finally, option 'c' lacks basic customer service courtesy as it appears to be a command directed to the customer.
