Answer:
c. communicate regular updates on the planning process to all employees.
Explanation:
In planning for a crisis, the leader has to focus on five integrated tasks that will allow to be more successful in dealing with it. These tasks are:
-Formulate an overarching vision of crisis management for the organization.
-Establish strategic goals and program objectives for crisis management.
-Coordinate the creation of a crisis management plan.
-Establish a communication plan.
-Develop a pre-crisis simulation plan for the organization.
According to this, the answer is that these tasks include all of the following except communicate regular updates on the planning process to all employees.
Answer:
1. Payback period = 2.8 years
2. Break-even time = 3.8 years
3. NPV = $12,577
Explanation:
NOTE: See the attached excel file for the calculation tables.
1. Determine the payback period for this investment.
Payback period = 2 years and [(49,600 / 70,800) * 12] months = 2 years and 8 months approximately = 2.8 years.
2. Determine the break-even time for this investment.
Break-even time = 3 years and [(23,622 / 36,199) * 12] months = 3 years and 8 months approximately = 3.8 years
3. Determine the net present value for this investment.
Net present value (NPV) of this investment is $12,577
Answer:
D. Acquardica, whose market value of final goods is $170 billion and market value of final services is $90 billion for a year
Explanation:
GDP gross domestic product is the value of final goods and services produced within a year.
Therefore Option D indicates highest GDP of final goods/services produced for a year.
Answer:
pricing low
yes
Explanation:
Game theory looks at the interactions between participants in a competitive game and calculates the best choice for the player.
Dominant strategy is the best option for a player regardless of what the other player is playing.
Nash equilibrium is the best outcome for players where no player has an incentive to change their decisions.
if either firm charges high, they either earn 11 million or 2 million.
if either firm charges low, it would earn either 15 million or 8 million.
because the payoffs of charging low is higher than the payoffs of charging high, the best strategy is for the firms to charge low if there is no cooperation.
the game is a prisoners dilemma because the choice the firms make isn't the choice that will yield the highest payoffs. the choice that would yield the highest payoffs is to both charge high prices.