Answer:
current societal norms rendered the charitable immunity doctrine inapplicable to this case and that fundamental fairness allowed the court to deviate from established case precedent and find for Flagiello.
Explanation:
In Appeals, Nos. 293 and 351, Jan. T., 1964, from judgments of Court of Common Pleas No. 4 of Philadelphia County, Dec. T., 1963, No. 4018 is found a case of Mrs. C Mary, and her husband Thomas Flagiello against the Pennsylvania Hospital, in which the Flagiellos rightly stated that Mrs Mary was injured in the Pennsylvania Hospital where she paid $24.50 a day for hospital facilities and nursing care. An action of trespass was brought against the medical institution and two employees were said to be involved.
The hospital accepted their wrong doings but they should not be liable since they are an organization dependent on charity. After series of legal proceedings, the court finally affirmed that precedents would not be followed in the case and that charities, like the hospital, must be liable
The Victorian Workcover Authority is the Victorian state authority that manages Victoria's workers compensation scheme.
Explanation:
Victorian Workcover Authority is a body of the Australian government, which manages health and safety and the states's workers compensation scheme.
It provides workplace insurance and manages the workers compensation scheme. It provides the employees, with tools and tips on how to keep themselves safe at the workplace.
It also offers insurance covers to the employees, against work related injuries or illnesses. It also provides information to the employers, about employees returning to work after their injuries and illnesses.
C. Scan further ahead to give yourself enough time to stop.
