Although this is a very personal question that only you as a student can answer, it is still possible to look at examples of how most students work and how they would answer such a question.
When describing your work habits and work quality this semester, it is important to look at a number of things. Did you hand in your work in time? Did you miss any deadlines? Did you feel rushed when completing your work? Did you have time to study and revise your notes before tests?
When talking about whether you showed your best work, you can try to think of whether you felt satisfied with the work you presented. Think about the work you developed. Did you feel like you could have done better?
Finally, when thinking about whether you challenged yourself this semester, think of the time you invested in your work. Could you have done more? Did you prioritize your learning and your work? All of these questions will get you closer to an answer.
Answer:
They should inspect the property
Explanation:
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) was established in 1980. Its main purpose was to provide a regulations in response to threats to human health or the environment from hazardous waste sites.
First National must have forclosed Rayon chemical because there is release or possible release of harmful substance into the environment, Rayon chemical is liable or because of cost response.
Whatsoever the reason may be First National can inspect the property before Rayon chemical sells it off.
Answer:
An element that does not show trespass to realty is: d) Defendant refused to remove something he placed on the property after the owner asks him to remove it.
Explanation:
Trespass to realty means that a person traspass a property or an object that does not belong to him or her. Element D) wouldn't count as trespass because it doesn´t said the object was there without the initial permission of the owner.
Answer:
3 basic rights.
1.Religious freedom
2. Freedom of speach
3. Freedom of the press
Explanation:
All of our rights even inalianable rights come with limits.
The only right that has no limits is the freedom of thought which is the same as religious freedom. You have the right to think and believe anything. But even that has restrictions on how you can act on your beliefs. Your religious beliefs are not a license to do anything related to that belief. You can't engage in human sacrifice as a ritual for the belief. You can't hide behind your religous beliefs as a sheild against prosecution for murder.
"Freedom of religion embraces two concepts, -freedom to believe and freedom to act. The first is absolute, but in the nature of things the second cannot be. ~ <em>Cantwell v Connecticut.</em>
<em />
The freedom of speach also has limits. You can say anything but you can't yell fire in a crowded theater. Doing so could cause a stampede and endanger the lives of others. Likewise, we have an impeachment case before the Senate right now in which the former president incited a riot at the Capital complex that caused the death of 6 people. The question before the Senate is did the former President incite a riot causing death and destruction of public property?
The freedom of the press is a first amendment right. But that doesn't give a publisher the right to slander or print falsehood about another person. The freedom of assembly is another 1st amendment right, but there is a difference between a lawful and peaceful assembly and a riot that results in the death of 5 people and the destruction of property.
