Answer:
true
Explanation:
the vehicle most cross to the other the road or wait for the incoming vehicle
Answer:
a) Neither is right, because the brain actually exhibits 10 to 15% less activity when a person is focused compared to when they are unfocused
Explanation:
In the context, both Jonah and Eli are wrong because the according to the scientist, when a person is focused the brain actually exhibits less activity and less spontaneous than when a person is unfocused. Thus when a person is idle and unfocused, the brain is more active.
Hence the correct option is (a).
Carl Jung divided the psyche into tiers: the aware and the unconscious. The unconscious, in turn, is divided into the personal unconscious and the collective unconscious.
Carl Jung's concept is the collective unconscious. He believed that human beings are connected to every other and their ancestors through a shared set of stories. We use this collective cognizance to provide which means to the arena.
In the book, Jung classified human beings into number one sorts of mental features. Jung proposed the lifestyles of two dichotomous pairs of cognitive capabilities: The "rational" (judging) features: wondering and feeling. The "irrational" (perceiving) functions: are sensation and instinct.
The aim of individuation, equated with the extension of cognizance and the development of personality, is to divest the self of its fake wrappings of the personality, the mask the character uses to confront the arena, and the suggestive energy of numinous unconscious contents.
Learn more about Carl Jung here:brainly.com/question/3723957
#SPJ4
Answer:
They believed Earth to be much younger than current estimates.
Explanation:
Proponents of Catastrophism believed that the Earth has mainly been shaped throughout history by short and sudden violent catastrophic events. Such as comets, solar flares, and other world changing events. So much so that they envisioned Earth's age as being much younger than the current estimates provided by modern scientists.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
According to your question, there are only two parts to be answered, a) and b).
Being that the case, we can comment on the following.
A) This is an observational study and not an experiment because the research was only limited to observation, participants never receive any kind of treatment or another interaction to experiment with them.
B) Who were the subjects of the study?
The subjects of this study were women aged 65 and older who were tracked for several years. The observation revealed that those women who had a vitamin B12 deficiency were twice as likely to suffer severe depression as those who did not.
So, according to the American Journal of Psychology, these were the women observed during the study. There were no more experiments, interactions, or activities applied to them in order to consider it an experiment.
Let's remember that in order to consider an experiment as such, there has to be another component of the study, and the experimental part of it that has to be tested and proved passing the scientific method to conclude in something valid.
