1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Marta_Voda [28]
3 years ago
10

Social Learning Theory holds that: A. Employees learn what not to do by observing their leaders' behavior and its consequences B

. Employees learn what to do by observing their leaders' behavior and its consequences C. Employees learn what to do and what not to do by observing their leaders' behavior and its consequences D. Employees learn what to do and what not to do when antisocial behaviors exist
Business
1 answer:
alexgriva [62]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

B. Employees learn what to do by observing their leaders' behavior and its consequences

Explanation:

Social learning theory: In psychology, "social learning theory" is considered as one of the famous learning theory which was proposed by a psychologist named Albert Bandura. Social learning theory states that learning generally occurs through observing the other person. It encompasses that a new behavior is being learned through imitation process.

The main idea associated with social learning theory is that an individual tends to do things what he or she sees.

You might be interested in
The value of Terrah's personal residence has declined significantly because of a recent forest fire in the area where she lives.
Airida [17]

Answer:

<u>No</u> because the decline in value of her residence <u>does not</u> meet the "sudden, unexpected, and unusual, progressive deterioration" requirement for a casualty loss.

Explanation:

Terrah's house suffered no actual damage because of a recent forest fire in the area where she lives. Terrah cannot take a casualty loss for the decline in value of her residence caused by the fire as the decline in value of her residence dose not meet the "sudden, unexpected, and unusual, progressive deterioration" requirement for a casualty loss.

Final answer:

<u>No</u> because the decline in value of her residence <u>does not</u> meet the "sudden, unexpected, and unusual, progressive deterioration" requirement for a casualty loss.

5 0
3 years ago
Determine the amount to be paid in full settlement of each of two invoices (a) and (b), assuming that credit for returns and all
Veronika [31]

Answer:

a. $ 5157.

b. $2097.

Explanation:

See attached pictures.

7 0
3 years ago
_______ achieves organizational change through business process changes and dilivery of supporting business systems with a minim
Natalka [10]

Answer:

The correct word for the blank space is: Business System Acquisition Testing & Deployment.

Explanation:

The Business Capability Acquisition Cycle is an approach used by the U.S. Department of Defense (<em>DoD</em>) to perform business acquisition processes efficiently. This is carried out as a cycle with five (5) steps: <em>Capability Need Identification, Business Solution Analysis, Business System Functional Requirements & Acquisition Planning, Business System Acquisition Testing & Deployment, </em>and<em> Capability Support. </em>

In the <em>Business System Acquisition Testing & Deployment</em>, the DoD supports business systems with the ultimate goal to generate a change without deploying too many specialized personnel.

7 0
3 years ago
Partial-Year Depreciation Sandblasting equipment acquired at a cost of $42,000 has an estimated residual value of $6,000 and an
Deffense [45]

Answer:

A. Depreciation expense in 20Y5 = $900

Depreciation expense in 20Y6 = $3,600

B. Depreciation expense in 20Y5 = $2800

Depreciation expense in 20Y6 =$7840

Explanation:

Straight line depreciation expense = (Cost of asset - Salvage value) / useful life

($42,000 - $6,000) / 10 = $3,600

The depreciation expense would be $3600 each year except in 20Y5. when the equipment was used from October to December which is 3 months

Depreciation expense in 20Y5 = 3/12 x $3600 = $900

Depreciation expense using the double declining method = Depreciation factor x cost of the asset

Depreciation factor = 2 x (1/useful life)  = 2/10 = 0.2

Depreciation expense in 20Y5 = 0.2 x $42,000 = $8,400

But the equipment was only used for 3 months, so we would divide the figure above by 3

$8400 / 3 = $2800

Depreciation expense in 20Y5 = $2800

Depreciation expense in 20Y6 = book value in the beginning of 20Y6 x depreciation expense

Book value = cost of the asset - depreciation expense in 20Y5

$42,000 - $2800 = $39,200

Depreciation expense in 20Y6 = $39,200 x 0.2 = $7840

4 0
3 years ago
On June 30, the end of the first month of operations, Tudor Manufacturing Co. prepared the following income statement, based on
mezya [45]

Answer:

A. $1,280,600

B. $1,280,600

Explanation:

A. Preparation of an absorption costing income statement.

Tudor Manufacturing Co.

Absorption Costing Income Statement

For the Month Ended June 30, 2014

Sales (420,000 units) $7,450,000

Cost of goods manufactured $7,160,000

(500,000 units x $14.32 per unit)

($160,000 / 500,000 units = $0.32 per unit)

($14 per unit + $0.32 per unit = $14.32 per unit)

Less ending inventory $1,145,600

(80,000 units x $14.32 per unit)

Cost of goods sold $6,014,400

Gross profit $1,435,600

($7,450,000 - $6,014,400)

Selling and administrative expenses:

Variable selling and administrative expenses $80,000

Fixed selling and administrative expenses $75,000 $155,000

Income from operations $1,280,600

($1,435,600 - $155,000)

Therefore the absorption costing income statement will be $1,280,600

B.Calculation to Reconcile the variable costing income from operations of $1,255,000 with the absorption costing income from operations determined in (a)

First step is to calculate ending inventory difference

Ending inventory difference = $1,145,600 - $1,120,000

Ending inventory difference = $25,600

Now let Reconcile the variable costing income from operations

Reconciliation of Variable Costing and Absorption Costing Incomes from Operations

Variable costing income from operations $1,255,000

Add: Difference between absorption costing and variable costing ending inventories $25,600

Absorption costing income from operations $1,280,600

($1,255,000+$25,600)

Therefore the variable costing income from operations of $1,255,000 with the absorption costing income from operations determined in (a) will be $1,280,600

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Vending machines are most often used to sell:
    15·1 answer
  • Managers at sprocket inc. have recognized declining sales on their water purifier and must make a decision about what to do. the
    13·1 answer
  • A. suppose there is a surge in consumer confidence that creates an increase in aggregate demand in the economy. the federal rese
    9·1 answer
  • Equity securities in which the investor owns less than​ 20% ownership in the voting stock of the investee generally can be class
    15·1 answer
  • Jacob and Mason go to a diner that sells burritos for $5 and tacos for $3. They agree to split the lunch bill evenly. Mason choo
    10·1 answer
  • McDonald's marketing strategy during the last ten years has added healthy food options to its menu, phased out traditional arter
    14·1 answer
  • On December 31, 2018, Wasley Corporation borrowed $500,000 on a 10%, 10-year mortgage note payable. The note is to be repaid wit
    10·1 answer
  • Pauline received a postcard from a local antique mall. The card invited her to attend an invitation-only open house at the mall
    5·1 answer
  • Departmental contribution to overhead is calculated as revenues of the department less:
    13·1 answer
  • Which type of financial risk happens when the prices of things rise and fall?
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!