<em>A. Town Meetings.</em>
Explanation:
The Coercive Acts were passed in 1774 by the British Parliament, this was their response to the Boston Tea Party and were very harsh on the New England colonists.
After the Boston Tea Party, Great Britain was furious and decided to act very harshly on the Northern colonists. They passed the Coercive Acts, also known as the Intolerable Acts because they were so harsh. With these acts, Boston Harbor was closed until the colonists repaid Great Britain for the lost tea. Only needed and important items were allowed through and this did not make the colonists happy. Town meetings were not allowed and the colonists had to open their homes to British troops, making their homes free to board.
While this was just specific to Massachusetts, a lot of the other colonies were also angered because of this and felt as if this was against their natural and constitutional rights. They felt as if Great Britain was abusing their power and at this point would not stop.
Answer:
due to Louis XVI extravagant spending in the American Revolution and other factors such as the royal coffers being depleted and absolute monarchy as well as decades of poor harvest and skyrocketing bread prices. Even worse there were heavy taxes.
Explanation:
c the deficit is related to the e.t.c
Answer: A. a disagreement between the states over representation in Congress.
The main disagreement was over whether representation would be the same for all states, or based on a state's population size. Then there was also a question, for basing representation on population size, about whether slaves counted in a state's population or not.
The Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise were worked out during the United States Constitutional Convention in 1787 in order to resolve these issues.
- The Great Compromise resolved a dispute between small population states and large population states. Initially, a unicameral (one-chamber) legislature was envisioned. The large population states wanted representation in Congress to be based on a state's population size. The smaller states feared this would lead to unchecked dominance by the big states; they wanted all states to receive the same amount of representation. The Great Compromise created a bicameral (two-chamber) legislature. Representation in the House of Representatives would be based on population. In the Senate, all states would have the same amount of representation, by two Senators.
- The Three-Fifths Compromise was a way of accounting (somewhat) for the population of slaves in states that permitted slavery. For taxation and representation purposes, the question was whether slaves should count in the population figures. (They were not considered voting citizens at that time.) The Three-Fifths Compromise said that three out of every five slaves could be counted when determining a state's population size for determining how many seats that state would receive in the House of Representatives.
Answer:
i think it is "The bread and wine do not change – they stay as bread and wine ... but Christ is 'really present' in the bread and wine, in a spiritual way."
Explanation:
