They sometimes gain enough votes to cause a major party to lose
(Reasoning that might help you) There are usually only two major parties that have the most power in United States politics ,even though those parties have changed over time .Third party candidates ,how ever are still are still able to influence elections.A third party can gain votes from people who would have other wise voted for one of the major parties, and enough of these votes can cause the major party to lose .One of the most famous times this occurred was in the 1912 presidential election,When Theodore Roosevelt's Bull Moose party signed voters who would have supported the Republican William Taft . The Republican votes was split between Roosevelt Taft,so the democrat Woodrow Wilson won the election.
Answer:
The correct answer is an ascent in nativism and the Great Migration Explanation:
The old and the new came into sharp clash during the 1920s. While numerous Americans commended the rise of present day innovations and less prohibitive social standards, others firmly questioned the social changes of the 1920s.
PS:
(If this answers your question can you please vote me Brainliest? Thank you )
Answer:
The main forms of democracy are Direct Democracy, Representative democracy, Presidential democracy, Parliamentary democracy, Authoritarian democracy, Participatory democracy, Islamic democracy, and social democracy....... so there is a total of 8 democracies
Explanation:
i already did this:)
hope it helped you
The most logical generalization is letter b. people in rural areas have smaller dating pool than people in urban areas.
<em>People in rural areas do not necessarily have an advantage with dating applications because everyone knows everyone, the number of people is much smaller, and they are people who naturally have a culture of approaching one to another.</em>
- <u>Itens a.</u> (dating applications do not often lead to romantic partnerships) <u>and d.</u> (most rural residents have located romantic partners through dating applications) > Both are distant from the contextualization of the passage.
- <u>Iten c.</u> (fewer rural residents than urban residents have smart phones) > It is not a generalization. It is another kind of conclusion. Not all conclusions are generalizations.
