The best answer is
<span>because the president should not associate with the justices
The president should not wield his power to nominate justices as a tool for political power. The President should respect the independence of the judicial branch. To fill the Supreme Court with political allies would essentially give the president control over both the Executive and judicial branch. Indirectly, the power of his veto and the Supreme Court's power of judicial review would also give him great influence over the legislative branch as well. </span><span>
</span>
Buddhism pretty sure that s the answer?
Answer: A. less centralized than under Mauryan rule
Explanation:
"Abraham Lincoln" is responsible for ending slavery.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Lincoln started his political career by saying he was antislavery against the expansion of slavery but not advocating for immediate emancipation. Nevertheless, the man who started as antislavery finally released the Proclamation of Emancipation, which liberated all slaves in revolutionary nations.
Lincoln abolished slavery to destabilize the Southern resistance, reinforce the Federal government and promote free blacks to quarrel in the Union army, thereby maintaining the Union.
