Although both positions have a lot of merit and make a lot of sense, I would have supported the Federalists. I believe that this would have been likely, as their ideals match my own more closely. The Federalists believed that a strong federal government is preferable to strong state governments. I believe this to be the case, as a strong federal government is more likely to be able to ensure equal rights and protections across state lines. Moreover, a federal Constitution has the power to control the excesses and abuses of the federal government. Finally, I believe that new, modern industries were the future of the country, as opposed to farming.
Answer:
Sustainable development has been defined in many ways, but the most frequently quoted definition is from Our Common Future, also known as the Brundtland Report: "Sustainable development is development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs."
Answer:
I think the answer might be Electoral Alliance!!!
Explanation:
An electoral alliance is when two political parties work together for the purpose of voting of elections.
Answer:
Identify the ethical issues. Ethical issues exist, in a broad sense, whenever one's actions affect others. ...
Identify alternative courses of action. ...
Using ethical reasoning to decide on a course of action.
1. A group of people that seeks to influence public policy on the basis of a particular common interest or concern.
2.As a reminder, a political party is a group of people who organize to win elections, operate the government, and determine public policy, whereas an interest group is a group of people who share common goals and who actively try to influence policymakers. ... Their specific purposes within the government, however, differ.
