Answer:
D. Informal language
Explanation:
Presenting yourself in a lax, easy way, such as being informal, suggests to the audience that this is not a formal setting and that it's okay to be at ease, creating a friendlier space between your and your audience.
Answer:
<u>Perhaps the greatest difficulty with utilitarianism is that it fails to take into account considerations of justice. We can imagine instances where a certain course of action would produce great benefits for society, but they would be clearly unjust.</u><u>Utilitarianism provides a guiding framework of decision making rooted in social benefit which helps direct business toward more ethical behavior. It is the basis for much of our discussion regarding the failures of Enron, Worldcom, and even the subprime mess and Wall Street Meltdown.</u><u>For example, by selling quality and safe products, a business will be increasing its intrinsic value while meeting the needs of their customers at the same time. Back to the concepts of pain and suffering; the ethical position of utilitarianism is that human beings should be happier and have less suffering.</u>
Answer:
if we all are United and have peace
Scouring the internet and the back of my brain for information;
You can start by saying that both Germany and the US have done bad things, but that doesn't necessarily mean the people are bad/bad altogether or as a whole. Be inclusive with your ideas and try to compare them as much as possible to get a sense of correspondence between the two. Then move on with your text. For example, you could start by asking a question [Are Germany and the US awful on their own?] and then responding to that question with an answer [Not necessarily because...]. Afterwards, do a bit of comparing and then move on with your text.
Hope this helps you out. Feel free to ask for more information and I will offer you more support/help on your problem. <3
<u>[bloominginthedark/bloom]</u>
Answer: Here is the poem.
They had just finished singing it for the third time when Squealer, attended by two dogs, approached them with the air of having something important to say. He announced that, by a special decree of Comrade Napoleon, "Beasts of England" had been abolished. From now onwards it was forbidden to sing it. The animals were taken aback. "Why?" cried Muriel. "It's no longer needed, comrade," said Squealer stiffly. "'Beasts of England' was the song of the Rebellion. But the Rebellion is now completed. The execution of the traitors this afternoon was the final act. The enemy both external and internal has been defeated. In 'Beasts of England' we expressed our longing for a better society in days to come. But that society has now been established. Clearly this song has no longer any purpose." Frightened though they were, some of the animals might possibly have protested, but at this moment the sheep set up their usual bleating of "Four legs good, two legs bad," which went on for several minutes and put an end to the discussion. So "Beasts of England" was heard no more. In its place Minimus, the poet, had composed another song which began: Animal Farm, Animal Farm, Never through me shalt thou come to harm! and this was sung every Sunday morning after the hoisting of the flag. But somehow neither the words nor the tune ever seemed to the animals to come up to "Beasts of England
Minimus represents the producers of state-approved songs and slogans in Stalin's era.
Explanation:
The exercept was from "Animal farm"was an Utopian satire written by George Orwell and it was published in 1945. This was a fable based on Russian communistic system during g the Satllin regime and the betrayal of the cause of Joseph Satlin betrayal. The satire illustrate illustrate the way Stalinism had betrayed the ideals of the socialist revolution in the Soviet Union. The poet Minimus introduces a new song that is sung on Sunday mornings
