1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
babymother [125]
2 years ago
14

What is an authoritarian goverment?​

History
1 answer:
True [87]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

- favoring complete obedience

Explanation:

- subjection to authority as opposed to

 individual freedom

You might be interested in
What was the Supreme Court’s rationale for its Plessy v. Ferguson decision? What impact did the decision have on the North? The
Scrat [10]
Back then the supreme court <span>ruled that racially separate facilities, if equal, did not violate the Constitution. 
This indicates that racial segregation itself is regarded as legal by the Supreme court. Because of this, many people in the south started to separate their establishment and creating racial discrimination in the society.
Even though there is a couple occurrence while the north tried to do discriminate minorities, the majority of people tend to despise this ruling and keep creating effort to override it.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
What historical distinction did Sargon of Akkad earn by uniting these regions? A. He conquered the cruelest ruler in history. B.
ehidna [41]

Answer:

The correct answer is B. He created on of the worlds first empires

Explanation:

I took the test and i followed to other answer and got it wrong

7 0
3 years ago
Which important event held in Atlanta, Georgia, in 1996 had lasting impact on the culture and economy of Atlanta? the Three Gove
Alex_Xolod [135]
The Summer Olympic Games was an important event held in Atlanta, Georgia, in 1996 had lasting impact on the culture and economy of Atlanta.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the relationship between the Missouri compromise and the courts decision in the Dred Scott case
miv72 [106K]
Here is what I found!!! Hope this helps you!!
3 0
3 years ago
Which idea went away? Why? <br> Geocentric model or heliocentric model?
Hitman42 [59]

Answer:

most notable accomplishment is probably his proposed heliocentric, or sun-centered, model for the universe.

Believe it or not, a mere 500 years ago, nearly everyone believed the heavens rotated around the Earth in a geocentric model rather than the universe revolving around the sun (yes, I intended to use the word ‘universe’ the Copernican model proposes that the sun is the center of everything – but more on that later).

Copernicus wasn’t the first scientists to propose a heliocentric model. The earliest mention of a sun-centered universe actually dates back to 200 BCE, to a man named Aristarchus of Samos. Other non-Earth centered models had been proposed around the same time (such as Philolaus’ ‘central fire’ model, which postulated all of the bodies in the universe revolved around a central fire – the fire isn’t the sun – in 390 BCE). Scientists had also figured out that the Earth must rotate to account for the fact that the stars ‘move’ around us.

Unfortunately, these ideas caved to Aristotle’s theories, where he provides three common sense arguments against a non-Earth centered model. These arguments are:

1) If the Earth was spinning, why don’t objects fly off the Earth?

2) If the Earth was moving around the sun, why doesn’t leave flying birds behind?

3) and finally, If the Earth was in orbit around the Sun, why don’t we see a parallax effect seen in the stars?

For those of you who know a bit about physics, I can hear you laughing now. But, remember that we didn’t understand the laws of motion until Newton in the 17th century, nearly 19 centuries after Aristotle. The first two parts of Aristotle’s argument are easily refuted with a modern understanding of motion. If you stand still, you have the illusion that you aren’t moving because everything around you is moving at the same speed. If you were in a plane with no window to look out of, and no noise to give away it away, you’d have no idea if you were actually moving or standing still – because everything inside the plane is moving at the same speed.Seen above is an example of the Parallax effect. Unknown to Aristotle at the time, there is actually a parallax effect seen in the stars, it’s just extremely small. This particular objection doesn’t account for the vast distances in space.

Regardless, because of these objections, the Earth remained the center of the universe. In the second century CE, Ptolemy proposed a system that managed to predict the positions of the planets with unprecedented accuracy – even though the system continually had to be reset due to anomalies, it was the most accurate tool for prediction we had.

As an interesting side note, the Ptolemaic universe was very small, the distance to the stars was less than 20 Astronomical Units (or, less than two-thirds the distance to Neptune). Over time, the model was improved upon and it increasingly became more accurate when it came to predicting the motions of the planets. There was one strong issue with the Ptolemaic model – it didn’t adequately explain the retrograde motions of the planets, even with epicycles.

This is what lead Copernicus to propose the heliocentric model. If you put the sun at the center, and have the other planets rotate around it, the apparent retrograde motion is explained by Earth overtaking the more distant planets as it travels around the sun.

See an example here:

Image via WikiMedia

The Copernican heliocentric model wasn’t much more accurate than the Ptolemaic geocentric model – it didn’t even do away with the need for epicycles. The Copernican system was, however, much simpler. It used fare fewer epicycles than the Ptolemaic counterpart. The epicycles were still a pesky annoyance because the planets were thought to move around the sun in a uniformly circular motion. At the end of his life, Copernicus published his book De Revolutionibus Orbium Coelestium (On the Revolutions of Heavenly Spheres). He probably chose this timing to protect himself from the ridicule of his peers and the Church who thought VERY strongly of Aristotelian philosophy.

It wasn’t until Kepler, Galileo, and Newton came onto the scene in the seventeenth century, nearly a hundred years after Copernicus’ death, when his model of the universe actually started to be taken seriously. These three scientists managed to provide strong evidence for a heliocentric universe. Newton and Kepler laid down a mathematical foundation to explain the motions of the planets with extreme precision, Galileo collected mountains of observational evidence both supporting heliocentrism and challenging Aristotelian thinking.

Of course, today we know without a shadow of a doubt that the Earth revolves around the sun.

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What happened to Native Americans such as the Cherokees who opposed land allotment under the Dawes Act? They were forced by fede
    11·2 answers
  • Which is an Islamic belief?
    7·2 answers
  • 5. The sinking of which of the following ships lead to the U.S. entry into World War I? *
    6·2 answers
  • Five reasons why slavery should be abolished
    14·1 answer
  • What is the connection between life liberty and property
    7·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP !!! What does he mean by saying, "we are acting for all mankind"?
    13·1 answer
  • One historian has said that the holocaust began on the day that the Jews started to be treated differently. Explain what this st
    10·1 answer
  • English military experts created the colony of _____ as a military "buffer zone" between Florida and South Carolina
    9·1 answer
  • Federalists supported a strong central government. Which characteristics best describe
    11·1 answer
  • 1. Did Bolivar believe that a federal system of government would work well in Spanish South America?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!