B. False, neither side was victorious. <span />
Answer:
irst supporting and then repudiating Mexican regimes during the period 1910-1920.[1]
Explanation:
The United States involvement in the Mexican Revolution was varied and seemingly contradictory, first supporting and then repudiating Mexican regimes during the period 1910-1920.[1] For both economic and political reasons, the U.S. government generally supported those who occupied the seats of power, whether they held that power legitimately or not. A clear exception was the French Intervention in Mexico, when the U.S. supported the beleaguered liberal government of Benito Juárez at the time of the American Civil War (1861-1865). Prior to Woodrow Wilson's inauguration on March 4, 1913, the U.S. Government focused on just warning the Mexican military that decisive action from the U.S. military would take place if lives and property of U.S. nationals living in the country were endangered.[2] President William Howard Taft sent more troops to the US-Mexico border but did not allow them to intervene in the conflict,[3][4] a move which Congress opposed.[4] Twice during the Revolution, the U.S. sent troops into Mexico.
He considered circular tables more democratic than rectangular tables which were used by his predecessors.
The correct answer is converted to christian orthodox.
In 988 Vladimir prince of Kiev converted to christian orthodox in order to help to unify people.
The father of Vladimir was a prince in Rurik dynasty. Vladimir took over after the death of his father in 972. Before Vladimir taking over his father's post, he was a prince in Novgorod.
Vladimir consolidated the realm of Kievan from Ukraine, Baltic sea, Belarus and Russia. He unified people against Baltic tribes. eastern nomads and incursion of Bulgarian.
Those who were the followers of slavic paganism were being converted to christians by Vladimir and they were then christianized by Kiev Rus'
Answer:
ummm..... sir there is nothing to select
Explanation:
