Answer:
A reviewer looks over a product and finds positives AND negatives, while critics tend to look at negatives over positives.
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
Susan = 50 miles per hour
Ellen = 60 miles per hour
Total miles to and from Newyork and Boston= 220 miles
In twenty minutes, Susan drives
50 miles = 60 minutes
1 minute= 50/60= 0.833 miles
20 minutes = 0.833×20=16.667 miles
Ellen is 60 miles per hour
Therefore she drives:
60 miles= 60 minutes
1 mile = 1 minute
In 1 hour 40 minutes Ellen would be 100 miles into getting to Boston and in 2 hours Susan would be 100 miles towards New York
The poem is definitely rhymes but that’s just my opinion
Answer:
If your options are:
A. The poem uses variations of meter to affect rhyme.
B. The poem’s sentences flow across stanzas.
C. The poem’s stanzas have varying lengths.
D. The poem uses nontraditional syntax and rhyme scheme.
Then the answer is D.
Explanation:
The nontraditional syntax is best shown in the use of enjambment - interrupting the thought and syntactic structure in the middle and moving the rest to the next line. For example: "and older than the // flow of human blood (...)"
Here, the definite article "the" has been separated from the noun "flow", which means the phrase is visually broken in half.
- A isn't true because this poem conveys its meaning through rhythm and not rhyme. There are virtually no rhymes here and the syntax (sentence structure) is disrupted, invoking the sound of a river flowing in irregular but consistent waves.
- B isn't true because the sentences do flow across lines but not across stanzas.
- The stanzas do have varying lengths. But even though this element was pretty rare prior to the 20th century, it is not exclusive to modernist poetry. That's why C isn't true either.
