Considering the situation described above, this effort is an example of using <u>image differentiation</u> to differentiate a product as new.
<u>Image differentiation</u> is a type of differentiation strategy used by business firms to differentiate their products through communications.
By using communication strategies such as written, audio, digital, advertisement, or images to differentiate between various products or from existing products, this is an example of <u>image differentiation</u>.
Thus, when Next Up Computers only changes the cover designs alone, that is a form of <u>image differentiation</u>.
This is type of differentiation is often referred to as Reputation Differentiation.
Other types of differentiation methods include the following:
- Product differentiation
- Service differentiation
- Relationship differentiation
- Distribution differentiation.
- Price differentiation.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "<u>Image Differentiation."</u>
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/14302620
Answer:
(I) Price elasticity = 1/6
(II) the $2.5 price gives the higher revenue: 1,250
Explanation:
(I) price elasticity
↑Q (500 - 300)/((500+ 300) / 2)
↑Q 200 / (800/2) = 200/400 = 1/2
↑P (3.5 - 2.5)/((3.5+2.5)/2)
↑P 1/(6/2) = 1/3
(II) total revenue
3.5 x 300 = 1,050
2.5 x 500 = 1,250
Answer:
Explained below
Explanation:
1) From the question, we can deduce that in the short run, there will likely be news of the discovery/invention of a super vaccine which will make the consumers and the businesses to be optimistic about the future of the economy. Therefore, this will in turn lead to an increase in consumption by consumers and thus also lead to an producers making an increase in investment.
2) From answer 1 above, since there is an increase in consumption as well as investment, this will in turn also lead to an increase in the aggregate demand of the economy. Whereas, we are told that the oil market is calm and therefore we can say it does not have an effect on the supply curve.
From the first image attached, increase in the aggregate demand led to an increase in price level from point P to P1 on the y-axis while output output level increased from point Y to point Y1 on the x-axis.
3) In the long run, due to the increase in demand in the short run that makes the supply curve shift to its right, it means the producers will have more of the goods produced. This will in turn reduce the price to its initial level and also increase the output level. From the second diagram, this will lead to a shift long run aggregate supply from LRAS to LRAS1 on the x-axis.
Answer:
The answer is: I would do a cost benefit analysis to try to determine which option is the best.
Explanation:
In a cost-benefit analysis you examine the pros and cons of taking an action. You estimate all the costs involved in taking that action and all the possible benefits (or profits) that you will receive by taking that action.
A company will usually perform cost benefit analysis to try to decide which investments to make. For instance, I have $1 million to invest in different projects, my cost benefit analysis should tell me in which projects I should invest that return the largest profit.
If you are trying to decide how can you lose weight more efficiently, you would first estimate the costs of each activity. How much time you are going to spend? How much you have to pay or are they free?
Then you also estimate what benefits you might get form doing each activity. How much weight can I lose by doing each one? Can I save money by doing them? Will I enjoy doing it?
After you have estimated all possible outcomes, you will be able to decide which, if any, activity or activities you should do to lose some weight.
Answer:
The total economic cost is $40,500 per year
Explanation:
The total economic cost per year is equal to the sum of:
* The opportunity cost relating to sacrificing the current work Greg is working on which is equal to his yearly salary of : $40,00.
* The opportunity cost relating to sacrificing the interest income earned on $10,000 saving, which he is now used for purchasing equipment, which is calculated as: 10,000 * current rate of savings = 10,000* 5% = $500 ( total cost of equipment is not included because e could sell the equipment for what he paid later on).
=> So, total economic cost per year is $40,000 + $500 = $40,500.
