Answer:
See the explanation below.
Explanation:
The court likely to rule in favor of Ewing.
The reason is that the enough consideration that gives backing to a promise in this case is generally the waiver of a legal right to eat to obesity as requested by the other party.
The evidence that Ewing has lost 154 pounds in weight over the stipulated period is a consideration that sufficient enough under the law. The payment of $10 pound that Ewing has lost is a promise. The fact that Ewing also benefit from the weight loss does not matter.
Answer:
$60,000
Explanation:
According to section 1250 of the Internal Revenue Service, the depreciation previously allowed as a deduction would now be taxed in the case of ordinary income at the highest tax level.
And, For this, the asset should be depreciated real property.
In the question, there is depreciation charged for apartment building so the same is eligible
The eligibility is allowed up to $60,000 and the same is to be considered
Answer:
c. convergent thinking
Explanation:
Convergent thinking is the ability to think quickly about one or two good solutions to a problem, without needing to spend your time and thinking about it. This is especially important when it comes to decision-making processes. This is very different from a different idea, where you come up with a lot of possibilities
Your answer is C. Accumulated Depreciation will be credited. :D
