Explanation:
una persona o más dicho un humano
Answer:
The European presence in America spurred countless changes in the environment, negatively affecting native animals as well as people. The popularity of beaver-trimmed hats in Europe, coupled with Native Americans’ desire for European weapons, led to the overhunting of beavers in the Northeast. Soon, beavers were extinct in New England, New York, and other areas. With their loss came the loss of beaver ponds, which had served as habitats for fish as well as water sources for deer, moose, and other animals. Furthermore, Europeans introduced pigs, which they allowed to forage in forests and other wildlands. Pigs consumed the foods on which deer and other indigenous species depended, resulting in scarcity of the game native peoples had traditionally hunted.
European ideas about owning land as private property clashed with indigenous people's understanding of land use. Native Americans did not believe in private ownership of land; instead, they viewed land as a resource to be held in common for the benefit of the group. Colonizers erected fields, fences, and other means of demarcating private property. Indigenous people who moved seasonally to take advantage of natural resources now found areas off-limits, claimed by colonizers.
Explanation:
<span>Same genes </span>
<span>The homologous chromosomes have the same genes in common. </span>Each cell has at least two sets of chromosomes which one comes from one’s father also called as paternal chromosome and mother, called as the maternal chromosomes. These chromosomes are what makes the child obtain the characters and may depend on the traits the parents possess. Homologous chromosomes are not duplicated chromosomes or identical however, they are analogous or similar. The alleles for a specific characteristics isn’t the same but the same genes are in the same order.<span>
</span>
I think one about the significant issues that Japan confronts these days is not overpopulation. The Japanese populace has been declining over the previous decade or somewhere in the vicinity. The issue is not the quantity of individuals but rather the make-up of that populace.
The rate of Japanese individuals resigning or drawing near to retirement age has been expanding for quite a long time. Nowadays, there are more "old" individuals in Japan than there are "youthful" individuals. Japanese ladies are holding up longer to get hitched and couples simply are having the same number of youngsters as they did decades before.
This has put a tremendous strain on the Social Welfare framework on the grounds that there are essentially insufficient Japanese youngsters paying annuity premiums, charges or whatever to take care of the wellbeing expense and benefits advantages of every one of the individuals who either as of now have or will in the blink of an eye be resigning.
