Positive:Partisanship ensures that representatives in the government will stick to the policies of their party.
Voters who support one side of the argument can be more assured that their officials will represent their beliefs. Negitave :Partisanship might lead to deadlock in the political process.
Voters who don’t agree with either party will not have a good alternative to look to.
<span>I
think that the positives of partisanship is that the incumbent political leader
will have the (1) unwavering support from his cohorts with regards to the
projects, programs or laws that he/she will be implementing (2) their
aspirations and objectives are aligned which helps in catalyzing in the changes
that they may want to implement in the government or administration and (3) its
identity can endure simply because it is strengthened by affiliating itself to
gender, ethnic, religious and racial groups thus promoting a connection to a
party which eventually generates political stability and diminish political
influence by independents or nonpartisans. On the downside, partisanship may
(1) promote divisiveness especially if its advocacies are met with great
opposition by the non-cohorts and (2) there will be bias especially if
arguments are thrown against them which leads to the scrutiny of the opposing
views at a greater degree just to refute the said argument.</span>
<span>i'm not so sure, but I believe when the Europeans came to the Americans, they were conquering lands that the natives were already in which is why they had wars with the natives. Does that sound right to you? although i hope it's helpful for u :) </span>
