1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Gekata [30.6K]
4 years ago
12

What do you think are the potential positives and negatives to partisanship? Fill in the table with at least two positive and tw

o negative examples.
History
2 answers:
solniwko [45]4 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Positive:Partisanship ensures that representatives in the government will stick to the policies of their party.

Voters who support one side of the argument can be more assured that their officials will represent their beliefs. Negitave :Partisanship might lead to deadlock in the political process.

Voters who don’t agree with either party will not have a good alternative to look to.

Explanation:

shtirl [24]4 years ago
4 0

<span>I think that the positives of partisanship is that the incumbent political leader will have the (1) unwavering support from his cohorts with regards to the projects, programs or laws that he/she will be implementing (2) their aspirations and objectives are aligned which helps in catalyzing in the changes that they may want to implement in the government or administration and (3) its identity can endure simply because it is strengthened by affiliating itself to gender, ethnic, religious and racial groups thus promoting a connection to a party which eventually generates political stability and diminish political influence by independents or nonpartisans. On the downside, partisanship may (1) promote divisiveness especially if its advocacies are met with great opposition by the non-cohorts and (2) there will be bias especially if arguments are thrown against them which leads to the scrutiny of the opposing views at a greater degree just to refute the said argument.</span>

 

You might be interested in
1. What does Benard Atton gain as a result of this contract?
spayn [35]

Answer:

According to the contract subscribed between Bernard Atton and Leo, Abbot of Lagrasse in 1110, Atton "<em>ought to hold as a fief in Carcassonne the following: that is to say, the castles of Confoles, of Leocque, of Capendes (which is otherwise known as St. Martin of Sussagues); and the manors of Mairac, of Albars and of Musso; also, in the valley of Aquitaine, Rieux, Traverina, Hérault, Archas, Servians, Villatiitoes, Tansiraus, Presler, Cornelles</em>."

Also, he got the concession as a fief "the castle of Termes in Narbonne; and in Minerve the castle of Ventaion, and the manors of Cassanolles, and of Ferral and Aiohars; and in Le Rogés, the little village of Longville".

Moreover, he obtained the privilege of mounting the horses of Leo and also to receive homage when he visited the domains of the Abbot of Lagrasse.

Source: http://www.midi-france.info/191401_homage.htm

Explanation:

8 0
4 years ago
What would likely be the main complaint of African America officers in World War I?
Ratling [72]

Answer:

The service of African-Americans in the military had dramatic implications for African-Americans. Black soldiers faced systemic racial discrimination in the army and endured virulent hostility upon returning to their homes at the end of the war.

4 0
3 years ago
How does olligarchy work
Fiesta28 [93]
It's where only a few people get to rule someplace.
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which characteristics of justinian did procopius stress in the secret history?
kozerog [31]

The characteristics of Justinian that Procopius stressed was his cruelty,

wastefulness, and incompetence.

Justinian was the Byzantine emperor and he became unpopular as a result

of his heavy taxation on the people to fund war which didn't go down well with them.

Procopius who was a scholar and writer stressed in history about the

emperor's cruelty and wastefulness and incompetence due to his tax

reforms.

Read more on brainly.com/question/25286481

6 0
3 years ago
Pleaseee help ASAP it’s important last time
Diano4ka-milaya [45]

Answer:there were no guarantee to education

Explanation:

They were being oppressed bu their governors therefore when they got hurt they were out of their jobs I think this is right

Hope it helps.

3 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Wich roman contribution to political theory was adapted by the founding fathers
    15·1 answer
  • What were the Gender roles like for the people in Sparta
    6·1 answer
  • Three examples of economic globalization
    12·1 answer
  • How do private property rights encourage individuals to work, save, and invest?
    13·2 answers
  • During the English Civil War supporters of the king were mostly
    9·1 answer
  • Following World war II, Korea was divided into two nations. place each description in the correct category
    13·2 answers
  • Sundials of Mali put ____ in charge of provinces
    8·2 answers
  • What positive effects did the Crusades have on Europe?
    6·2 answers
  • Based on the data in the graph, which statements are
    8·2 answers
  • This excerpt describes an instance of deportation during the 1930s as part of a repatriation effect. Why did the federal governm
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!