Judicial activism is the act of passing ruling in a court not according to the law, but to personal beliefs and preferences. The opposite of judicial activism is judicial restraint, in which the judges follow the constitution exactly and abstain from passing ruling not specified in the constitution.
<span>The author, Ron Chernow, presents Hamilton as an overly ambitious man but his ambitions were motivated not by egocentric deeds but by passion and determination to build the foundations of American success and prosperity. Clearly, his actions were influenced by ambition and not by principle. This is expressed in one example as written by Chernow, “To repudiate his legacy.” Another is “in many ways, to repudiate the modern world.” </span>
Gilgamesh was. Hope it helps!
The Maya civilization was divided into different city states
