D is the answer of the questions
Answer:
Passage 2 is more effective because the evidence is logical and is supported by anecdotes
Explanation:
2021 on edge
<span>subject joined by an act as a plural compound </span>
I am writing to let you know about an incident that occurred at our school this morning and to ask you to discuss the matter with your child.
At about 9:20 this morning, one of our fourth-grade students looked in her desk and saw a snake.
The student did not reach into the desk, but instead alerted the teacher. The teacher immediately evacuated the classroom and alerted our administration.
Our custodian and a school volunteer went to the room and retrieved the snake. It was disposed of over the back fence and into the woods behind our school. We believe the snake was a nonpoisonous black snake.
We spoke to all the students in the class and none appeared to show any signs of trauma from the event. Students returned to the classroom after the snake was removed and instruction continued normally for the rest of the day.
Thank you for everything you do for your child and our school. If you have any questions or concerns, please call the school.
Answer:
Appeal to authority
Explanation:
A logical fallacy is a flaw in reasoning.
The type of a logical fallacy found in the given passage is called the appeal to authority (or argumentum ad verecundiam). It occurs when a person claims that something is true (or untrue) simply because a valid authority or expert on the issue said so.
Here, the authority in question is a highly respected local doctor. According to the speaker, we should agree with him only because he is one of the smartest and most prominent citizens. There are no legitimate arguments in favor of the mentioned candidate for mayor.
