Answer:
The duties under the teaching contract cannot be delegated
Explanation:
The person wit whom the school has a binding agreement was Teresa and contract of services cannot be delegated unilaterally by Teresa to her friend Shirley without consulting the school authority.
The appropriate procedure would be for Teresa to discuss with the school her plans to let Teresa to cover up for her absence,however, if the school accepts the new arrangement , Teresa would need to be relieved of her duties as this would be a permanent substitution.
Answer:
this situation can be classified as an duopoly
Explanation:
An duopoly is similar to a monopoly but instead of only supplier there are two suppliers that share total market power and control. Both companies also offer basically the same product or service. Competition exists between the companies but it is not significant, both companies decide to coexist. Customers are forced to choose between one company or the other.
In this case, there are only two taxi companies and the customers really don't care what company they use since they both offer similar services. None of the companies even bothers to offer a better service to try to gain a larger market share.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Outside directors are members of the board of directors that are not employees of the corporation. While an inside director is a member of the board that is also employed by the corporation, e.g. CEO.
Corporations are separate entities form their stockholders, that is why limited liability applies to them. The board of directors doesn't have to include stockholders or employees, they usually do, but it is not required by law. Outside directors should very experienced and capable individuals that possess certain expertise that can help the corporation. Also, the board should control and supervise upper management, but if only inside directors were admitted into it, then who would control them?
Answer:
The correct answer is A.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
On October 1, 2014, Mann Company places a new asset into service. The cost of the asset is $80,000 with an estimated 5-year life and $20,000 salvage value at the end of its useful life.
Annual depreciation= (original cost - salvage value)/estimated life (years)
Annual depreciation= 60,000/5=12,000
3 months depreciation= 12,000/12*3= 3,000
This shorter payback period is positive and beneficial to the consumer, as it allows for harmony with amortization expenses.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- A short payback period is beneficial because of its relationship to amortization, as long-term debt allows this amortization to take place.
- These amortization expenses allow the cost of long-term assets to be represented in the payment.
- However, when the short-term payback period allows for amortization, causing the asset's value to be reduced by the amount that will be paid by the consumer.
In this case, we can state that in cases like the one shown in the question above, the short payback period is very beneficial and interesting to the consumer, as it can promote economic benefits.
More information:
brainly.com/question/23160357?referrer=searchResults
