There is a significant historical discrepancy between Richards and Nunn and Qian's account of the Columbian trade because:
Richards looks at the trade from the perspective of Native Americans, who were exploited and died as a consequence of the illnesses breakout (such as smallpox), whereas Nunn and Qian view it as a way for the Old World to advance technologically by using the items of the New World.
<h3>What are the particular historical events, developments, or circumstances that took place from 1491 until 1607?</h3>
It is well known that Nunn and Qian had a favorable influence in regards to the rich soil that brought about the rise in regards to economics and urbanization as it is an advantage to the Europeans.
A historical occurrence that is supposed to have been the event of the Spanish invasion of the Aztec kingdom is something that might help Richards with his views.
The problem of the ∨irginia corporation, which employs capitalism and amassed a significant amount of wealth in the new globe by means of the manufacturing of goods using slave labor, is the historical occurrence that might lend credence to the Nunn and Qian views.
Find out more about the historical event from the.
brainly.com/question/19578897
#SPJ1
I think that statement is true
The usage of current fossil uses is heavily damage the environment and will potentially make it unusable for the next generation
hope this helps
<span>I think its C.A large labor force that had left the villages was available for work in city factories.</span>
