Answer:
Hi! Unfortunately, <u>I can't give you the exact answer since your question is incomplete.</u> I did a little research online, but wasn't able to complete it on my own. What I did find out is that this task is referred to a passage from <em>Faulkner (Ice Hockey)</em>. So, let's try to figure it out together.
Explanation:
In order to pick the correct answer for this question, you have to <em>carefully read the passage and see what its words make you feel.</em> Ask yourself: What does it transmit? How do I feel reading these words? What is its spirit? When you answer this in your own head, you will know the answer. <em>Is the tone of the passage enthusiastic, is it cynical, does it sound like someone is obliged to participate? Does it sound like it is the first time that the person talking sees something? Does it sound like a sports broadcast?</em> Well, think carefully about it, and <u>you'll have the answer.
</u>
Trust yourself, you'll do great!
Its D. These orders were sufficient, I well knew, to insure their immediate disappearance, one and all, as soon as my back was turned.
He says do one thing while knowing they won't listen.
Basically, sarcasm and irony are the same thing. They both mean the exact opposite of what they REALLY are saying. So what is the difference?
Irony can naturally occur in both language and circumstance; one experiences irony when something the exact opposite of what was was expected happens.
Sarcasm can make use of irony to make an observation or remark about an idea, person or situation. Sarcasm is generally used to express riducle or reservation of an expression or idea.
Hope this helps! (:
We can fill in the blanks with the modals provided in the following manner:
- Don't eat this fruit. It might be poisonous.
- This may prove harmful for your health.
- This, perhaps, could lead to death.
- It should not be eaten raw.
- Before eating, it skin must be removed.
First, when it comes to modal verbs, it is important to understand that more than one answer is possible. Their meanings often overlap and depend on the context.
Let's briefly break down each modal verb:
- "Can" indicates possibility, permission, and ability.
- "Could" is the past form of "can". It indicates the same things as "can", but it is also used in more formal, polite conversations.
- "May" indicates possibility.
- "Might" is the past form of "may". It also indicates possibility, but a more distant, less likely one.
- "Must" indicates supposition/assumption or obligation.
- "Should" indicates lighter obligation, suggestion, or advice.
Learn more about modal verbs here:
brainly.com/question/6250914
