Since BD bisects angle ABC, that means angle ABD and angle CBD are equal to each other. With that set up the equation to solve for x like this:
-4x+33 = 2x+81
-2x -2x
————————
-6x +33 = 81
-33 -33
————————
-6x = 48
————- (divide by -6)
-6
x = -8
Now substitute that to ABD
-4(-8) +33
32 +33
=65
here’s CBD
2(-8) + 81
-16 + 81
=65
Finally angle ABC will be double the amount of ABD or CBD so 65 times 2 is 130.
ANSWERS: (angles)
ABD and CBD: 65
ABC: 130
Answer:
Yes, and?
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
a
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
c. Inductive and Strong
Step-by-step explanation:
In inductive reasoning, provided data is analyzed in order to reach a conclusion. In this case, the argument provides data regarding Jane and Nancy's awards and their love for mathematics and then draws a conclusion regarding Nancy's performance in a particular class, this is an example of inductive reasoning.
As for the strength of the argument, it is plausible to infer that Jane and Nancy have similar mathematics skills since they both love calculus and excel academically. Therefore, if Jane does well in the calculus class, it is a strong argument to say that Nancy does as well.
The answer is :
c. Inductive and Strong
Answer:
C) The parabola is narrower and reflected across the x-axis.
Step-by-step explanation:
The original parabola has equation:
The transformed parabola has equation
How wide the graph is can be determined by the absolute value of the coefficient.
The smaller the absolute value of the coefficient, the wider the graph.
Since
The original graph is wider than the transformed graph.
Also the negative factor tells us there is a reflection in the x-axis.
