Answer:
Because it was a time when the United States was establishing itself as a nation. Thus, the possibility and realization of a land where it was not necessary to pay taxes to any king, was very opportune for traders from all over the world who wanted to establish a good business.
Explanation:
1750-1800 was a period of establishment of the USA, at that time the separatist movements that sought to promote the independence of the USA began, also began the moments that formed the American nation, which became a land of opportunities, since it was not necessary to pay taxes the king, nor follow strict dogmas.
In this case, the establishment of the USA as a nation has allowed many traders to settle in the country, looking to leverage their business and succeed.
The Framers wanted it to be relatively easy to consider changes to the Constitution. Yet they wanted proposed changes to be carefully considered.They also wanted to be sure that Amendments had the full support of the nation.Therefore, it is more difficult to ratify an Amendment and make it into law than it is to propose, or suggest, it.
Answer:
Punishment. Massachussetts Colonists/Colonists in America.
Explanation:
The Bristist Parliment passed a series of laws in 1774, after the Boston Tea Party. This was also know as the intolerable acts. They passed these laws to punish the colonists for the Boston Tea Party.
The five Intolerable Acts were:
- Boston Port Act.
- Administration of Justice Act.
- Massachusetts Government Act.
- Quartering Act.
- Quebec Act.
I hope this helps!
Answer:
Hero of democracy:
1. Centralized the banking system
2. Supported education-based on merit
3. Took first steps towards democracy.
4. Instituted civil code.
5. Believe in equal taxation.
Enemy of democracy:
1. Believed in no equality between sexes.
2. Disregarded civil rights.
3. He was a tyrannical leader.
4. yellow journalism/propaganda reform.
5. Forced people into the army.
If it is written down, it's called "libel" whereas if it's spoken, it's called "slander." Defamation law attempts to balance the freedom of speech and open exchange of ideas without giving someone permission to run around spreading lies about another that may harm his or her reputation, ability to earn a living, etc.
