Answer and Explanation:
1. he presents arguments that reaffirm that the colonies must separate from Great Britain because all men are equal before God and it is not right that one control the other. In addition, he claimed that the right to freedom, life and the search for one's own happiness without having to be in debt to someone, or needing someone's permission, were inalienable rights, so it was not up to England to withdraw or repress them. them.
2. The declaration of independence cannot be seen as a direct threat of war. This is because the colonies did not have the desire to face a military power like Great Britain. However, the declaration of independence was a complaint pointing directly to dissatisfaction with the British crown and reaffirming that the colonies would be independent at all costs, even if it generated a war.
3. He represents these arguments, showing that governments should be based exclusively on "absolute acquiescence in the decisions of the majority." Thus, he affirmed that governments should be representatives of the people and work for this representation and not for a concentration of power, where the people should act for the government.
Answer:
it is banned in other countries too
Explanation:
What do you need help with ?
You can do something that pop out like a picture pop 3D a lot of pictures in information for others can Understand
Answer:
Freedom is capacity of the individual that exists outside of society.
Explanation:
Freedom - A person's legal competence.
This means that legally, a person that has freedom, and it is in common sense that they would have it. Outside of society, it would be different and not the same, But we still have the right to entitle freedom to ourselves
