1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
blondinia [14]
3 years ago
6

Suppose Bekah agrees to do bodywork on Fatima's car. In exchange, Fatima agrees to be a poker dealer at Bekah's underground casi

no. In the state where Bekah and Fatima live, there is a gaming statute that says all games of chance other than slot machines and the state lottery are illegal. Would the agreement between Bekah and Fatima be enforceable?
Social Studies
1 answer:
Gre4nikov [31]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

No

Explanation:

Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario the agreement between Bekah and Fatima would not be enforceable. This is mainly due to the fact that the agreement breaks one of the state's laws and would therefore be considered a crime, which they would both be sentenced for.

You might be interested in
Where does cheapest critical thinkers guide to reasoning start the process
allsm [11]
That question doesn't make sence can you pease re-state the ____not a bot____

6 0
3 years ago
You decide to eat one more chip. The change in the total amount gained that comes from this action is the _____ .
a_sh-v [17]
The correct answer that would best complete the given statement above would be the second option: MARGINAL BENEFIT. <span>You decide to eat one more chip. The change in the total amount gained that comes from this action is the marginal benefit.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
[It is] the custom of pedagogues [teachers] to be eternally thundering in their pupil's ears . . . while the business of the pup
Nuetrik [128]

Answer:

its d

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HELP. WILL BE MADE BRAINLIEST.
Sophie [7]

Answer:

C. Providence

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
A cartel differs from a monopoly in that (1 point)
tatyana61 [14]
A cartel differs from a monopoly in that businesses making the same product agree to limit production. The definition of a cartel is "in economics, a cartel is an agreement between competing firms to control prices or exclude entry of a new competitor in a market."
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Jonathan is afraid to ask a girl for a date, so his therapist instructs him to relax and simply imagine he is reaching for his c
    13·1 answer
  • Mr. Kim's experience of chronic back pain is influenced by his cultural background, his attentional processes, and nerve damage
    13·1 answer
  • Folk songs and folk musical are our cultural heritages. justify​
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements about the impact of the financial market is TRUE?
    12·1 answer
  • ENG- Would someone correct or review my script of 'Capitalism for Kids', could be its concept, idea, or writing mistakes, Thank
    8·1 answer
  • Briefly discuss the different type of societies<br>​
    6·1 answer
  • Why do nations trade with each other?
    7·2 answers
  • You are the clerk on duty at the luggage storage. During your shift, Mr. Ruangroj a VIP guest came with a three Armani paper bag
    11·1 answer
  • 1)__________ pressurize the government to make international trade agreement with other nations.
    5·1 answer
  • Đặc điểm chung quan niệm duy vật thời kỳ cổ đại là tìm nguồn gốc của thế giới những dạng vật chất cụ thể. Đúng hay sai và giải t
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!