Answer: D) Sentence 2 provides supporting evidence for the reason stated in sentence 1.
Explanation: In the given excerpt from an argument that supports the claim that the government should limit the amount of sugar in sugary drinks, we can see that the principal reason or argument is expressed in sentence 1: "Consuming too much sugar can lead to dangerous medical conditions" then, in sentence 2, we have some examples of medical conditions caused for the consumption of sugar, which helps to support the idea of sentence 1: "For example, people may develop obesity, tooth decay, or adult-onset diabetes."
Explanation:
parallelism means that the same from of words is used in the entire group of words.
Hope this is helpful
Answer:
The sentence that best supports the inference that Madeleine's parents are supportive of her artistic interest it:
Her basement was equipped with countless expensive art supplies, including an easel, dozens of sets of various paints, and stack after stack of specialty paper.
Explanation:
<u>According to the passage, Madeleine would spend hours as a child painting in the basement. Since she was young and had no means to make her own money, the fact that she had expensive art supplies leads us to infer that her parents were supportive of her artistic interest. We can assume they were the ones buying her the supplies. That is why the best option is:</u>
Her basement was equipped with countless expensive art supplies, including an easel, dozens of sets of various paints, and stack after stack of specialty paper.
Answer: B) The fate of Wes Moore, the prisoner, is an example of how the criminal justice system has become too harsh in sentencing.
If I'm not mistaken, its a fused run-on sentence. A comma splice is where there is an unneeded comma, and it isn't a simple as it contains a conjunction.
