Answer:
I need more info!
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
-0.89 (i think)
Step-by-step explanation:
Since the graph seems to be going downwards from the right, it has a negative correlation. And since the data seems to be pretty close together, the correlation must be strong. That narrows the answer down to -0.89
If its wrong then i'm not a smart person, and it's -0.15
Step-by-step explanation:
Let the number be x.
<u>1</u><u> </u> =8 + x
6
6×<u>1</u>=6×8+6×x
6
1=48+6x
1-48=6x
<u>-</u><u>4</u><u>7</u>=<u>6</u><u>x</u>
6. 6 x = -7 <u>5</u>
6
x is equal to minus seven whole number five divided by six.
Answer:
698 fishes
Step-by-step explanation:
Generally, we can represent an exponential growth function as;
y = a•(1 + r)^t
originally, there were 3 fishes
The original value in this case means a = 3
After 6 weeks, there were 31
31 in this case is y
r is the increase percentage or rate
t is the time
So, we have it that;
31 = 3•(1 + r)^6
31/3 = (1 + r)^6
10.33 = (1 + r)^6
ln 10.33 = 6 ln (1 + r)
ln 10.33/6 = ln (1 + r)
e^0.3892 = (1 + r)
1 + r = 1.476
r = 1.476-1
r = 0.476 or 47.6%
So the growth percentage or rate is 47.6%
For 14 weeks, we simply have the value of t as 14;
So ;
y = 3•(1 + 0.476)^14
y = 3(1.476)^14
y = 698 fishes
1 cup of oil would equal up to 8 fluid ounces