Answer:
Pros of Mandatory Voting
Mandatory Voting Would Increase Voter Turnout
Compulsory Voting Would Change Campaigning for the Better
Compulsory Voting Would Encourage Engagement in the Political Process
Compulsory Voting Would Discourage Voter Suppression
Cons of Mandatory Voting
Compulsory Voting Would Encourage an Uninformed Electorate
Compulsory Voting Would Hamper Freedom of Choice
It would be a burden to law enforcement
Compulsory Voting Could Infringe on Religious Rights
Explanation:
Mandatory voting requires some countries with eligible citizens to register and vote in elections. In the United States, voting is not mandatory; it is a freedom that citizens of the US have stated in the Constitution.
Answer: Wilson wanted the League of Nations to provide international security and stability.
The League of Nations was an intergovernmental organization founded on 1920 as a result of the Paris Peace Conference that ended the First World War. Its main goals were to prevent wars, facilitate disarmament and settle international disputes.
The League was not always successful in implementing sanctions or enforcing its resolutions. After some failures in the 1920s, the League was incapable of preventing aggression by the Axis powers in the 1930s. After the Second World War, the League was replaced by the United Nations.
<span>What is the social, economic<span> , </span>political<span> , and cultural </span>context<span>in which you live the hype of alejandria?</span></span>
Answer:
the answer is letter b
primary and secondary sources related to the event
Assuming that you're referring to the Unsigned Southern Press review of 1852, i think the writer was using first person point of view plural.
In the review, the writer keep using the word 'we' such in : "we doubt Mrs. stowe would recognize the cogency of this argument"
hope this helps