All categories

3 years ago

How is the number of jobless claims related to a nation's broad economic goals?

Business

2 answers:

jasenka [17]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

It is an indicator of efficiency

Explanation:

A Country's employment rate indicates how much population is producing, therefore the jobless claims is an indicator tat shows how efficient is the economy.

luda_lava [24]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

It is an indicator of efficiency

Explanation:

Jobless cases are a revealed measurement week after week by the U.S. Branch of Labor that checks individuals documenting to get joblessness protection benefits. There are two classes of jobless cases introductory, which contain individuals petitioning, and proceeding, which comprises of unemployed individuals who have been accepting joblessness benefits for some time. Unemployed cases are a significant driving marker on the nature of the work circumstance and the wellbeing of the economy.

You might be interested in

PLEASE HELPPP

motikmotik

Answer:
I envision myself 10 years from now in a beautiful 2 story house. A nice luxury sports car, and I envision myself being a Real Estate agent.
I would like to be Independent, and learn what is it like to live on my own. And learn new things. I will need to pay for things like: Electricity, Gas, Water, and food. I'll need a stable job, and a reliable car.
It would cost around 1,200$ each month.
It would be 14,400, without taxes.
It's about 15,000 dollars compared to my 14,400 for necessities. So if I work Minimum wage I could afford to live. I would make 600$ less though.

I will be within my Budget, I will be able to afford everything that I need.

I could learn from others who have been successful in their life. And I could work my way up into a company, or make my own based off of the knowledge that I gained from learning from others.

If I stick to a budget, I will have money left over. And it will teach me to be more responsible with my money and it will also teach me to save.

Whenever I could.

Explanation: You can change it, if you want.

4 0

2 years ago

2. On January 2, 2017, heavy equipment costing $800,000 was purchased. The equipment had a life of 5 years and no salvage value.

Naddika [18.5K]

Answer:

The solution to the given problem is done below.

Explanation:

(a) Depreciation

for Financial Depreciation for Temporary

Year Reporting Purposes Tax Purposes Difference

2017 $160,000 $264,000 (104,000)

2018 $160,000 $360,000 (200,000)

2019 $160,000 $120,000 40,000

2020 $160,000 $56,000 104,000

2021 $160,000 0 $160,000

$800,000 $800,000 0

(b) 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total

Future taxable

amounts:

Depreciation $(200,000) $40,000 104,000 $160,000 $104,000

Deferred tax liability: $104,000 × 40% = $41,600 at the end of 2017.

8 0

3 years ago

With a patent on drug Z27, why would Able Drug Company charge customers $7 per 100 units even though its cost of producing 100 u

Dafna1 [17]

If Able Drug Company already has a patent on a drug called drug Z27, then they have the rights to charge it higher than cost of production. They do this so that they would gain profit from the drug that they have patented and to be able to expand their business more with it.

5 0

3 years ago

What would happen if a supplier charged more than the market price

Yuri [45]

Equilibrium is the intersect of the two curves. The curves show you how much the producers supply and how much the consumers demand at each possible price.

The demand curves shows that the higher the price is, the less the consumers demand. That's obvious—the consumer wants something, but not at any price. He's only willing to pay so much. If the price goes higher and higher, less and less people want to buy the good.

The higher the price is, the more the producers can supply. This is because some producers are able to produce at lower costs; they're better and more efficient than other producers. Other producers, who produce at higher costs, would go bankrupt if they tried to produce at lower prices. But when the price goes up, even the worse producers, who have higher costs, are able to make profit. So, more producers supply to the market.

What happens now, when the price gets lower than the equlibrium? As you can see from the chart, producers would supply less than consumers would be willing to consume at that particular price. There would be SHORTAGE. This happens when the goverment sets price ceilings (like on gas in the 30's). An opposite situation happens when there is price floor—for example minimum wage (because wages are prices too; prices of labor). In that case, there is surplus—in case of minimum wage that means surplus of labor (unemployment).

But when the markets are free to set the price, they will quickly establish equlibrium again. The producers will see that there is a shortage. They'll realize they can set higher prices and make bigger profits. They can't set higher price than the equilibrium though, because there would be surplus and they would have their warehouses stuffed with goods noone wants to buy at that price.

This is the Answer Am 100% sure.

3 0

4 years ago

Suppose you buy 100 shares of stock initially selling for $50, borrowing 25% of the necessary funds from your broker; that is, t

lana [24]

Answer:

money invest is $3750

amount of loan owned to broker = $1350

when selling price is $40 rate of return = - 29.33%

when selling price is $50 rate of return = - 2.67%

when selling price is $60 rate of return = 24%

Explanation:

given data

No of share = 100

initial selling = $50

borrow = 25%

initial margin purchase = 25%

interest rate = 8%

to find out

How much money invest and How much borrow from broker and rate of return at end of 1 year at (i) $40, (ii) $50, (iii) $60

solution

we know total investment is here

total investment = No of share × initial selling per share

total investment = 100 × 50

total investment = $5000

borrow fund is = 0.25 × 5000 = $1250

and Equity invest = total investment - borrow fund

equity invest = 5000 - 1250 = $3750

and

amount of loan own to broker at the end of year is

amount of loan = borrow fund × ( 1 + rate )

amount of loan = 1250 ( 1 + 0.08)

amount of loan owned to broker = $1350

and

selling price here after 1 year is $40

so rate of return is = $\frac{(no of share * selling price) -loan amount - equity invested}{equity invested}$ ........................1

rate of return is = $\frac{(100 * 40) - 1350 - 3750}{3750}$

rate of return = - 29.33%

and

selling price here after 1 year is $50

put here value

rate of return is = $\frac{(100 * 50) - 1350 - 3750}{3750}$

rate of return = - 2.67%

and

selling price here after 1 year is $60 so from equation 1

put the value

rate of return is = $\frac{(100 * 60) - 1350 - 3750}{3750}$

rate of return = 24%

7 0

3 years ago