All categories

3 years ago

140 fluid ounces increased by 45%

1 answer:

4 0

First divided 140 by 100 to find out how much 1 percent is
140 ÷ 100 = 1.4

multiply 1.4 by 45 to find 45 %; 1.4 x 45 = 63

then add 63, which is 45%, to 140, which is 100%, and you get 203, which is 140 + 45%, or 145%

please mark brainliest if this helped you. I hope it did!

You might be interested in

A store is having a sale on jelly beans and trail mix. For 3 pounds of jelly beans and 2 pounds of trail mix, the total cost is

Nata [24]

the cost for each of jelly beans and each pound of trail mix is $2.5 and $1.75

<u>Step-by-step explanation:</u>

Given A store is having a sale on jelly beans and trail mix. For 3 pounds of jelly beans and 2 pounds of trail mix, the total cost is $11. For 5 pounds of jelly beans and 6 pounds of trail mix, the total cost is $23 . We have to find the cost for each pound of trail mix and each pound of jelly beans.

Let the cost of each pound of trail mix is $y.

and the cost of each pound of jelly beans is $x.

According to question,

For 3 pounds of jelly beans and 2 pounds of trail mix, the total cost is $11.

⇒ $3x+2y=11$ → (1)

For 5 pounds of jelly beans and 6 pounds of trail mix, the total cost is $23

⇒ $5x+6y=23$ → (2)

Solving (1) and (2), we get

3(1 equation)-(2 equation)=0

⇒ $3(3x+2y)-5x-6y=3(11)-23$

⇒ $9x+6y-5x-6y=10$

hence,

⇒ $4x=10$

⇒ $x=2.5$

Putting $x=2.5$ in $3x+2y=11$ we get ;

⇒ $3x+2y=11$

⇒ $3(2.5)+2y=11$

⇒ $2y=11-7.5=3.5$

⇒ $y=1.75$

Hence, the cost for each of jelly beans and each pound of trail mix is $2.5 and $1.75 .

6 0

3 years ago

A. Do some research and find a city that has experienced population growth.

horrorfan [7]

A. The city we will use is Orlando, Florida, and we are going to examine its population growth from 2000 to 2010. According to the census the population of Orlando was 192,157 in 2000 and 238,300 in 2010. To examine this population growth period, we will use the standard population growth equation $N_{t} =N _{0}e^{rt}$
where:
$N(t)$ is the population after $t$ years
$N_{0}$ is the initial population
$t$ is the time in years
$r$ is the growth rate in decimal form
$e$ is the Euler's constant
We now for our investigation that $N(t)=238300$ , $N_{0} =192157$ , and $t=10$ ; lets replace those values in our equation to find $r$ :
$238300=192157e^{10r}$
$e^{10r} = \frac{238300}{192157}$
$ln(e^{10r} )=ln( \frac{238300}{192157} )$
$r= \frac{ln( \frac{238300}{192157}) }{10}$
$r=0.022$
Now lets multiply $r$ by 100% to obtain our growth rate as a percentage:
$(0.022)(100)$ =2.2%
We just show that Orlando's population has been growing at a rate of 2.2% from 2000 to 2010. Its population increased from 192,157 to 238,300 in ten years.

B. Here we will examine the population decline of Detroit, Michigan over a period of ten years: 2000 to 2010.
Population in 2000: 951,307
Population in 2010: 713,777
We know from our investigation that $N(t)=713777$ , $N_{0} =951307$ , and $t=10$ . Just like before, lets replace those values into our equation to find $r$ :
$713777=951307e^{10r}$
$e^{10r} = \frac{713777}{951307}$
$ln(e^{10r} )=ln( \frac{713777}{951307} )$
$r= \frac{ln( \frac{713777}{951307}) }{10}$
$r=-0.029$
$(-0.029)(100)$ = -2.9%.
We just show that Detroit's population has been declining at a rate of 2.2% from 2000 to 2010. Its population increased from 192,157 to 238,300 in ten years.

C. Final equation from point A: $N(t)=192157e^{0.022t}$ .
Final equation from point B: $N(t)=951307e^{-0.029t}$
Similarities: Both have an initial population and use the same Euler's constant.
Differences: In the equation from point A the exponent is positive, which means that the function is growing; whereas, in equation from point B the exponent is negative, which means that the functions is decaying.

D. To find the year in which the population of Orlando will exceed the population of Detroit, we are going equate both equations $N(t)=192157e^{0.022t}$ and $N(t)=951307e^{-0.029t}$ and solve for t:
$192157e^{0.022t} =951307e^{-0.029t}$
$\frac{192157e^{0.022t} }{951307e^{-0.029t} } =1$
$e^{0.051t} = \frac{951307}{192157}$
$ln(e^{0.051t})=ln( \frac{951307}{192157})$
$t= \frac{ln( \frac{951307}{192157}) }{0.051}$
$t=31.36$
We can conclude that if Orlando's population keeps growing at the same rate and Detroit's keeps declining at the same rate, after 31.36 years in May of 2031 Orlando's population will surpass Detroit's population.

E. Since we know that the population of Detroit as 2000 is 951307, twice that population will be $2(951307)=1902614$ . Now we can rewrite our equation as: $N(t)=1902614e^{-0.029t}$ . The last thing we need to do is equate our Orlando's population growth equation with this new one and solve for t:
$192157e^{0.022t} =1902614e^{-0.029t}$
$\frac{192157e^{0.022t} }{1902614e^{-0.029t} } =1$
$e^{0.051t} = \frac{1902614}{192157}$
$ln(e^{0.051t} )=ln( \frac{1902614}{192157} )$
$t= \frac{ln( \frac{1902614}{192157}) }{0.051}$
$t=44.95$
We can conclude that after 45 years in 2045 the population of Orlando will exceed twice the population of Detroit.

8 0

3 years ago

A figure is located at (0, 0), (−3, −4), and (−3, 0) on a coordinate plane. What kind of 3-D shape would be created if the figur

Kisachek [45]

Answer:

a cone

Step-by-step explanation:

a cone would be formed due to the point on the graph forming a triangle, and when a triangle is spun around an axis on one of its sides it will form a cone

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

PLEASEE HELP I NEED IT its about due

kherson [118]

Answer:

∠GJK is 22°

Step-by-step explanation:

Because the shape is a rectangle we know that GH is parallel to JI

This means that because of the alternate angle rule we know that

5x+8 = 7x-16

Then we solve for x

5x+8-5x = 7x-16-5x

8+16=2x-16+16

$\frac{24}{2}$ = $\frac{2x}{2}$

x=16

So this means that ∠HJI is 68°

Because the shape is a rectangle we know that ∠GJI is a right angle

This means that ∠GJK is 90-∠HJI because of the angles on a right angle rule

90-68 =22

∴∠GJK is 22°

4 0

3 years ago

True or False? A triangle can have side lengths of 3, 3 , and 6

asambeis [7]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

We can check with the Pythagorean Theorem.

a^2 + b^2 = c^2

a and b are always the smaller sides, the legs

c is the longer side, the hypotenuse

3^2 + 3^2 > 6^2

9 + 9 > 36

18 < 36

18 is not greater than 36, therefore this triangle can not have the side lengths 3, 3, and 6.

6 0

2 years ago