1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Veronika [31]
3 years ago
13

Depreciation Methods Vorst Corporation's schedule of depreciable assets at December 31, 2016, was as follows: Asset Cost Accumul

ated Depreciation Acquisition Date Residual Value A $100,000 $ 64,000 2015 $20,000 B 55,000 36,000 2014 10,000 C 70,000 33,600 2014 14,000 $225,000 $133,600 $44,000 Vorst takes a full year's depreciation expense in the year of an asset's acquisition and no depreciation expense in the year of an asset's disposition. The estimated useful life of each depreciable asset is 5 years. Vorst depreciates Asset A on the double-declining-balance method. How much depreciation expense should Vorst record in 2017 for Asset A? a. $6,400 b. $32,000 c. $14,400 d. $25,600
Business
1 answer:
lions [1.4K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

c. $14,400

Explanation:

Double declining depreciation method can be described as an accelerated depreciation technique which charges depreciation expense faster than the straight-line depreciation method, because double declining method obtains its depreciation rate by multiplying the rate of straight-line depreciation method by 2.

From the Vorst Corporation's schedule of appreciable assets at December 31, 2016, the following data are obtained for Asset A:

Cost = $100,000

Accumulated Depreciation = $64,000

Acquisition Date = 2015

Residual value = $20,000

Estimated useful life = 5 years

Therefore, we have:

Straight line method depreciation rate = 1 / Estimated useful life = 0.20, or 20%

Double declining depreciation rate = Straight line method depreciation rate * 2 = 40%

Beginning book value in 2017 = Cost - Accumulated Depreciation = $100,000 - $64,000 = $36,000

Depreciation expense for 2017 = Beginning book value in 2017 * Double declining depreciation rate = $36,000 * 40% = $14,400.

Therefore, Vorst should record $14,400 as depreciation expenses in 2017 for Asset A.

Important End Note:

Under the double declining depreciation method, residual is adjusted for in the last year of the estimated useful life of the asset.

Based on the information for Asset A, its last useful year is 2019 and that is why the residual value is not adjusted for in 2017 above.

You might be interested in
Product X-547 is one of the joint products in a joint manufacturing process. Management is considering whether to sell X-547 at
Katena32 [7]

Answer:

b. 1,2,3,4

Explanation:

Lets first understand what relevant cost is? Relevant cost is any cost that influences the decision of a decision maker. Therefore, the first four items are relevant in the decision of whether to sell the X-547 or to further process it.

Explanation for each item is as follows:

1- Selling price of X-547:

The selling price is relevant because it will help to determine the revenue generated from selling X-547 at the split off point and which could also be used for comparative purposes, if suppose the decision of further processing is chosen.

2- Variable cost of processing X-547 into Xylene:

The variable cost of processing X-547 is indeed relevant too, because at this stage management is not in a position to take a decision until they explore the possibilities coming out of processing X-547, therefore, in order to come to a decision making position the management will need to know the variable cost of processing X-547, making it relevant in the decision.

3- The avoidable fixed costs of processing X-547 into Xylene:

There is sometimes a fear (i.e fear of increase in step-fixed costs as a result of processing a product or fear of loss of control over costs) felt by the management when trying to process certain products for further development therefore those fixed costs which can be avoided during processing X-547 can also influence (i.e encourage) the decision of further processing X-547, making it relevant.

4- The selling price of Xylene:

The last but not the least, the selling price of Xylene. If the management finds that if X-547 is further processed into Xylene and it sells at a highly favorable/lucrative price, creating a huge margin for them then definitely they would be encouraged to taking the decision of further processing it.

5 0
3 years ago
HURRY HURRY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
lawyer [7]
No, its okay not to use all that extra stuff, so F
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
You are considering two investment alternatives. The first is a stock that pays quarterly dividends of $0.32 per share and is tr
MrMuchimi

Answer:

The 1-year HPR for the second stock is <u>12.84</u>%. The stock that will provide the better annualized holding period return is <u>Stock 1</u>.

Explanation:

<u>For First stock </u>

Total dividend from first stock = Dividend per share * Number quarters = $0.32 * 2 = $0.64

HPR of first stock = (Total dividend from first stock + (Selling price after six months - Initial selling price per share)) / Initial selling price = ($0.64 + ($31.72 - $27.85)) / $27.85 = 0.1619, or 16.19%

Annualized holding period return of first stock = HPR of first stock * Number 6 months in a year = 16.19% * 2 = 32.38%

<u>For Second stock </u>

Total dividend from second stock = Dividend per share * Number quarters = $0.67 * 4 = $2.68

Since you expect to sell the stock in one year, we have:

Annualized holding period return of second stock = The 1-year HPR for the second stock = (Total dividend from second stock + (Selling price after six months - Initial selling price per share)) / Initial selling price = ($2.68+ ($36.79 - $34.98)) / $34.98 = 0.1284, or 12.84%

Since the Annualized holding period return of first stock of 32.38% is higher than the Annualized holding period return of second stock of 12.84%. the first stock will provide the better annualized holding period return.

The 1-year HPR for the second stock is <u>12.84</u>%. The stock that will provide the better annualized holding period return is <u>Stock 1</u>.

6 0
3 years ago
A customer with a moderate income from a secure job is in the 28% tax bracket. She has a small diversified portfolio and has $10
Fofino [41]

Answer:

a or b is the answer I am not sure so I gave two options

7 0
2 years ago
In its fiscal 2018 annual report, Nike, Inc. reported cash of $4,000 million at the beginning of the year. The statement of cash
gulaghasi [49]

Answer:

Option C, $5,020 million is correct

Explanation:

The below is the statement of cash flow for Nike Inc 2018:

Net cash from operating activities                                 $3,027

Net cash from investing activities                                  ($1,067)

Net cash from  financing activities                                   ($940)

Net increase in cash and cash equivalent in 2018        $1,020

Beginning Cash and cash equivalent                             $4,000'

Balance in cash account at the end of fiscal year          $5,020

The correct option then is C.$5,020 million.

Option A is wrong because it only takes into consideration net cash from operations,option B is also as it considered only the increase in cash in the year without the opening balance of cash,while option D and E are obviously irrelevant

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Booth's fixed assets were used to only 50% of capacity during 2018, but its current assets were at their proper levels in relati
    8·1 answer
  • Zang Co. manufacturs its products in a continuous process involving two departments, Machining and Assembly. The following trans
    6·1 answer
  • For nonprofit organizations, strategy is long-term thinking related to
    14·1 answer
  • Will Andrew's profession as an architect lower his tax liability? A. Yes; an employee's profession determines their tax bracket
    8·1 answer
  • Does it make sense for ethan to take a year off of school to raise the money?
    6·2 answers
  • _____ is used to coordinate supply chain members through point-of-sale (POS) data sharing and joint planning. a. Confidentiality
    13·2 answers
  • Coronado Industries is planning to sell 750000 units for $1.50 per unit. The contribution margin ratio is 20%. If Coronado will
    7·1 answer
  • Source: Tommy Stubbington and Ben​ Edwards, open double quoteU.K. to Repay First World War ​Bonds,close double quote Wall Street
    8·1 answer
  • If the dollar contribution margin per unit is increased by 8%, total fixed expenses is decreased by 18%, and all other factors r
    5·1 answer
  • Sales mix is the relative percentage in which a company sells its multiple products. the trend of sales over recent periods. a m
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!