All categories

3 years ago

A company looking to expand internationally with little risk would choose?

Business

1 answer:

leva [86]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

Licensing
Franchising

Explanation:

There are no options but Licensing as well as Franchising are some of the least riskiest ways to expand internationally.

With Licensing, the company looking to expand simply sells licenses to various companies in different countries giving them the right to use their image. Basically, the company the license is sold to gets access to the seller's intellectual property but then can run their business with a significant degree of autonomy.

Franchising represents another way to expand with little risk. It involves a company giving a license to another company to sell and sometimes produce their products as well as image rights. The company will give the franchisee (company that gets the license) the knowledge and training required to maintain the franchise and in exchange, franchisee pays a fee.

Both of these methods ensure that the name and brand of a company spread internationally whilst making money from it. Risk is minimized because the investment in other countries is low to nothing.

You might be interested in

Money is an unlimited resource.<br><br> TRUE<br><br> FALSE

Yanka [14]

You use money everyday and my answer would be a false

8 0

3 years ago

TB 01-85 Payment of accounts payable decreases both I...

Eva8 [605]

I think it’s true

(Not sure)

4 0

3 years ago

WeeBee Company has three assembly labor dassifications: 5-1, S-2, and S-3. The three dassifications are paid $16, $19, and $22 p

liq [111]

Answer:

b.use the S-2 employee

Explanation:

Calculation for the the most cost-effective solution

S-1 S-2 S-3

Time for 1 unit (in minutes) 30 24 21

Units in 1 hour 2 2.5 2.857142857

(60/30= 2)

(60/24=2.5)

(60/21=2.857142857)

Wages per hour $ 16.00 $ 19.00 $ 22.00

Wages per/ unit $ 8.00 $7.60 7.70

($ 16.00/2=$8)

($ 19.00/2.5=$ 7.60)

($ 22.00/2.857142857=$ 7.70)

Ranking

S-1 $ 8.00 III

S-2. $7.60 I

S-3 7.70 II

Therefore based on the above Calculation the most cost-effective solution will be to use the S-2 employee

4 0

3 years ago

According to "sleep rules raise trucking costs," in 2013 the federal motor carrier safety administration estimated the new rules

erik [133]

The government really just expected reduced highway fatalities. Even though that it costs these multibillion dollar companies a little more to let their drivers rest, it sill makes the roads safe for all drivers. Driving while tired is almost as bad as driving under the influence, so making sure that these truck drivers get sleep make sure everything is super safe for everyone.

5 0

3 years ago

Can you breifly explain why stockholders' investment and revenues increase stockholders' equity, while dividends and expenses de

Scilla [17]

From an accounting standpoint, stockholders' investment and revenues increase the assets of the company without adding to the liabilities. Therefore according to the equation (A = L + E), equity must increase.

Similarly, issuing dividends and paying expenses pays cash out of the company, which decreases assets without changing liabilities. Therefore equity must decrease.

Another way to think of it is: what contributes to the company's profit and/or value, and what decreases these things? Well, revenues and people investing in the company are good (and therefore good for stockholders), and giving cash out and paying expenses are costs to the company (and therefore decrease value for stockholders).

5 0

3 years ago