Answer:
It's best to invest in the second economy
Explanation:
The question does not provide information on the hypothetical economic expectations of the two economies, but as a risk-averse investor, it's a better idea to try to "spread" the risk instead of concentrating it.
In the first economy, conditions might or might not be good. If they are good, returns will be extraordinary because all stocks will provide good returns, but if conditions take a turn for the worse, all stocks prices will fall and the financial consequences will be catastrophic.
In the second economy, results might never be as good as in the first economy, but they also will not ever be as bad. The risk is spread between various stocks, and while some may fall in price, others will rise, and viceversa. For a risk-adverse investor, this a far better option.
This is an education app... thanks for the points tho lol
Answer:you make an offer to buy your neighbor's house.
Explanation:
As seen from the aforementioned alternatives which all have insurable interest.Thus they are expantiated;
1)Firstly,a savings and loan company holding a mortgage on your home has an insurable interest on interest of the property on insurance premium.
2)Secondly,your lease makes you liable for fire damage to your rented premises makes for an insurable interest which is in form of mortagee/morgator contract,even if it isn't your property,it makes you liable for an insurable interest.
3)Thirdly,you have custody of a valuable painting when the owner is away also makes you eligible for an insurable interest.Though here as carrier,it still gives the right to an insurable interest courtesy of the fact that it is in your custody.
Finally,you make an offer to buy your neighbor's house doesn't make you eligible for an insurable interest because it's just a matter of a vocal agreement,thus no transaction has been carried out and therefore,no property transferred to your custody either way.
Answer:
Lois will save $152.51 when she wil transfer her balance.
Explanation:
Amount to be paid in 1 year for original credit card is given as

Here
is the amount to be paid after P is the balance which is 970,
is the APR for first credit card which is 24.2% and t is compounding frequency which is 12 so

Similarly for the second one the values are calculated as

The differnce of the two values is calculated as

The difference is $152.51 which she could save.
Answer: Has competitively valuable value chain match-ups with the company's present businesses such that its businesses can perform better together than apart.
Explanation:
The better-off test of diversification is that the company must gain a return that is higher than incremental growth. Incremental growth is usually defined a 1 + 1 = 2 formula and this test argues that Diversification must provide more than this such that the company achieves synergistic growth ( 1 + 1 = 3) which is what happens when different entities work better together than alone.
Diversification should therefore be into an area that will be able to match-up with the company's present businesses such that its businesses can perform better together than apart and produce even greater returns.