1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
8_murik_8 [283]
2 years ago
9

The question is: "Without actually graphing, describe how the graph of y = ( -2^(x+17) ) - 4.3 is related to the graph of y = 2^

x"
Mathematics
1 answer:
mojhsa [17]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The function has been flipped due to the negative in front.

The function has been shifted 17 units to the left.

The function has been shifted 4.3 units down.

Step-by-step explanation:

When functions are transformed there are a few simple rules:


  • Adding/subtracting inside the parenthesis to the input shifts the function left(+) and right(-).
  • Adding/subtracting outside the parenthesis to the output shifts the function up(+) and down(-).
  • Multiplying the function by a number less than 1 compresses it towards the x-axis.
  • Multiplying the function by a number greater than 1 stretches it away from the x-axis.
  • Multiplying by a negative flips the graph.

The graph of (-2^{x+17}) -4.3 compares to 2^x in the following ways:

The function has been flipped due to the negative in front.

The function has been shifted 17 units to the left.

The function has been shifted 4.3 units down.

You might be interested in
For the rational function f(x)= 5x3-x/2x3 , identify any removable discontinuities.
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.

Step-by-step explanation:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s rece

3 0
2 years ago
Need this asap please
Reptile [31]

Answer:

Third one is correct because it says it must be more than 2 not 2 or more.

The one you choose would be like, it must be 2 or more.

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If a basketball has a volume of 12,114.7 cm3, what is the distance across of a basketball
kirza4 [7]


All we need to do is start with the volume formula. Then, input the volume and solve the equation for the radius. And double it to get the diameter.

V = (4/3)pi(r^3)
12114.7 = (4/3)pi(r^3)  Divide both sides by (4/3) and pi
2893.64 = r^3              Take the cube root of both sides
14.25 = r

So the diameter is about 28.5 cm (14.25 x 2 = 28.5)
4 0
2 years ago
The nth term of a sequence is 60-8n. Find the largest number in this sequence.
natka813 [3]

Answer:

52

Step-by-step explanation:

1st term is =60-8=52

a2=60-16=44

a3=60-24=36

a4=60-32=28

a5=60-40=20

a6=60-48=12

....

sI the terms are 52,44,36,28, 20,12,4,-4,-12....

so the largest term is 52

6 0
2 years ago
A square root is categorized as what kind of number?<br><br> Choices:<br> Irrational <br> Rational
anyanavicka [17]
<span>Rational i believe is the answer i ain't for sure though</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Write a fraction less than 1 with a demoninator of 6 that is greater than 3/4?
    14·1 answer
  • 25h to the power of 10 +18
    8·1 answer
  • 6x^3 - 7x^2 - 3x = 0. Show the correct steps.
    15·2 answers
  • Is 0.5 less than 0.25
    14·2 answers
  • If A(0,0) and B(2,5) find AB
    6·1 answer
  • What is the length of BC¯¯¯¯¯ ?
    5·1 answer
  • 3/8 + 1/8 - 2/7 + 1/4=
    11·1 answer
  • I need help please and thank you
    13·1 answer
  • What is 4/7 x 4/7? I’m just a middle schooler whose confused :(
    11·2 answers
  • my grade right now is a 79.7 percent this is my final grade but my teacher said I can do extra credit which is 10 points. If I d
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!