Upper class individuals are more likely to work in safer environments, such as an office is not an explanation for the given statement.
Answer: Option C
<u>Explanation:</u>
In the given statement the discussion involves life expectancy with respect to education, occupation and income and explain its meaning that upper class live longer and healthier lives than those in lower class.
But the statement that upper class individuals are more likely to work in safer environments, such as an office do not categorize statement according to lower or upper class, that safer environment for work can be available among educated, occupated and handsome income constituted society only, because many brutal cases are examples of unsafe working atmosphere too and even in well structured office.
Education, Occupation and Income are sources of happiness but decision to stay happy and sensible for either rich or poor basically generate from within’s intellectual learning and not biased with any race.
Answer:
Im not possitive, but I would say A, False, and True.
Explanation:
This isn't exactly my best subject, so take this as a suggestion.
The federalists had an advantage over the anti-federalists during the ratification process for the constitution because the Federalists had been part of the deliberations surrounding the Constitution and understood the plan for the new government better than the Anti-Federalists.
Federalists pushed for states' rights and collaboration, while Anti-Federalists promoted the idea of a powerful executive chosen by the consent of the governed.
The Anti-Federalists opposed the national power grab. They preferred small local governments with sparsely populated areas and limited national authority.
Federalists believed the Constitution was necessary to preserve the freedom and independence that the American Revolution had ushered in. The Federalists undoubtedly possessed a new political theory, but they believed that protecting the Revolution's social gains was their most important task.
To learn more about government here
brainly.com/question/4160287
#SPJ4
Answer:
Many people found that His idea around how a prince should behave revolve around exploiting his authority.
Explanation:
Machiavelli held the position as an Italian Diplomat when he wrote "The prince". He intended this writing to be some sort of guidelines that up and coming nobles could use as a way to "Rule".
Here are several key points in "The prince":
- The prince need to focus on building a strong military's. Machiavelli believed that other positive things such as wealth, security, and longevity will be easily obtain as long as the prince has the power to "Force" others to conform to his bidding
- The end justify the means. Machiavelli stated that in order to rule, the princes will often face situations when they must abandon their morale to achieve their goals.
- The princes must surrounded themselves with a group of wise-men that's selected based on their capabilities alone. Not their principles.
- The prince need to somehow be popular amongst the people.
Answer:
Conventional is the second stage of moral development proposed by Kohl-berg. At this stage, most of the children and adults internalize the moral value in themselves. At this stage, children internalized the authority but not oppose it.
In the conventional stage, there is two-stage that are developed by children.
Good interpersonal relationship: At this stage children developed a sense of being seen good in the relationship in front of others.
To maintain the social order. : In this stage children are aware of the rules and norms of society.
