Answer:
physical
Explanation:
Because you can see the evidence that is left behind. ( I hope that makes sense)
Mixture- Heterozygous(different types) and compound
Pure substance- Homozygous(same types) and element
Mixed nuts - m salt - m
oxygen - p tin - p
fruit salad - m sugar - m
lead - p hot tea - m
silver - p vegetable soup - m
sand in water - m soil - m
Answer:
This is an example of marginal analysis, as the decisions made by Raphael are on margin.
Explanation:
The decision of Raphael about pool versus bike time is totally a "how-much decision". It is clear that pool time and bike time can both reduce the time for race. However, the efficiency of pool time is high currently, and hence there is much sense in trying to spend more time in the pool and less on bike. This however makes no sense that all the time is spent in the pool and no time biking. Raphael only intends to alter the number of hours spend on each activity at the margin.
Here is information for both perspectives:
Federalists
I would support the federalists because they believed in a strong central government that would help to unite the states. Along with this, the creation of a new stronger federal government would help to solve the problems America faced under its first constitution, the Articles of Confederation. Under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government could not tax or even raise an army. With the new US Constitution, the federal government would have these necessary powers in order to ensure safety within American society.
Anti-Federalists
I would support the Anti-Federalists because they were advocates of states rights. Along with this, the Anti-Federalists knew that a central government with too much power could very easily result in a monarchy, much like the one the United States experienced when controlled by Great Britain.
