Is this is the question the way it was asked? I’m a little confused
Well, the more in demand the object/service is, the more amount of people will want to pay for it, which will lead to pay raises and happy workers.
Ready Repair Service enters into a contract to fix washers and dryers in Scrub n' Dry Company's coin-operated laundries. If Ready Repair breaches by only partially performing the contract, Scrub n' Dry can C. sue Ready Repair for compensatory and consequential damages.
Scrub n' Dry can sue Ready Repair if they do not hold up the full contract that was agreed on. Consequential damages are a type of compensatory damage. Since Scrub n' Dry did not receive all of the compensation they were entitled to based on their initial agreement they can sue to be awarded the funds that were lost. Compensatory damages are only meant to compensate a person for what they lost not punish the other company/individual.
Answer: -0.5
Explanation:
Based on the information given, the price elasticity of demand will be calculated as follows:
= dQ/dP × P/Q
where,
dQ/dP = -1
P = 100
Q = 200 – P + 25 U – 50 P beer
Q = 200 - 100 + 25(8) - 50(2)
Q = 200 - 100 + 200 - 100
Q = 200
Therefore, dQ/dP × P/Q
= -1 × (100/200)
= -1 × 1/2
= -1 × 0.5
= -0.5
The price elasticity of demand is -0.5.
Answer:
Alicia should toys to her line of business as payback is 2.97 years which is almost the same as her projection.
Explanation:
In judging whether or not Alicia should add toys to her line of business,the actual payback period on the toys business.
The payback as found in the attached is 2.97 years.
In computing the payback period, I picked before the cumulative cash turns positive,year 2 plus(cumulative cash flow in year 2/cash flows in year 3)