Answer:
Units of Product XYZ must be produced during October are A) 1,400
Explanation:
Units of Product XYZ must be produced during October = Units of Product XYZ are sold during October + units of Product XYZ on hand October 31 - units of Product XYZ on hand October 1.
Gala Corporation has 300 units of Product XYZ on hand on October 1 and 500 units on hand October 31.
The company plans to sell 1,200 units of Product XYZ during October.
Units of Product XYZ must be produced during October = 1,200 + 500 - 300 = 1,400 units.
Answer:
Explicit cost = $2,000,000
Explanation:
Explicit costs
<u><em>Explicit costs</em></u><em> are out-of-pocket expenditures incurred for the purpose of a project or business, They represent cash outflow expenses which actually involve the payment for cash. For example, the $2 million cost of building the warehouse and office. </em>
<em />
Implicit costs
<em>On the other hand</em><u><em>, implicit costs </em></u><em>are the value of the benefit sacrificed in favor of a decision. They are known as opportunity cost. For example, the $5000 per year which Munif would forgo if he expands the business. </em>
When a corporate executive has to decide whether to market a product hat might have undesirable side effects for a small percentage of users but that would be beneficial for most user, the decision turns on the benefit to the many versus the harm to the few. Of course, all possible precautions should be taken to protect the few. A more specific answer depends in part of which system or ethics is applied. From a utilitarian perspective, under a cost-benefit analysis, if the product were sold, it could benefit the greatest number of persons-future and current employees, as well as shareholders, and most consumers, If there was "bad" publicity, and ti was adverse enough to reduce sales, however, more persons could benefit from the decision not to market the product.
Answer:
4.89%
Explanation:
Real rate of return = 3.37%
Inflation rate = 1.47%
The nominal rate of return is computed as shown below:
= [ (1 + real rate of return) x (1 + inflation rate) ] - 1
= [ (1 + 0.0337) x (1 + 0.0147) ] - 1
= (1.0337 * 1.0147) - 1
= 1.04889539 - 1
= 0.04889539
= 4.889539%
= 4.89% approx.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Team cohesiveness by itself does not necessarily lead to higher team productivity, team members might be united and have strong interpersonal relationships, but that doesn't guarantee high productivity or success.
But when team cohesiveness is paired with a high commitment to quality performance, then you can expect an increase in the productivity of all the team members.
