How did lincoln-douglas debates benefit lincoln

2 answers:

8 0

Mostly by attracting attention. Lincoln was not well-known prior to the debates.The debates themselves were not directly for the Presidential election in 1860,

Ket [755]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

The Lincoln-Douglas Debates benefited Abraham Lincoln by making him well-known to the American society, as until that time he was just an ordinary politician.

Explanation:

The Lincoln-Douglas Debates were a series of public speaking sources between Abraham Lincoln, Republican, and Stephen Douglas, Democrat, on the occasion of the 1858 midterm elections in the state of Illinois.

The total of seven public debates were well received by the citizens of the United States and were accompanied nationwide by well-known newspapers. The debates did not treat issues from the state of Illinois itself, but slavery in the United States. Douglas accused Lincoln of wanting to achieve complete equality of whites and blacks.

Although Lincoln received widespread acclaim and fame, the Democrats won the midterm elections in Illinois and Douglas was confirmed as senator. Still, Lincoln benefited from the Lincoln-Douglas debates. Nationwide coverage of the duels made him known throughout the nation and made him appear as a honest, eloquent politician.

You might be interested in

Description of compromise of 1850

Snowcat [4.5K]

A set of laws, passed in the midst of fierce wrangling between groups favoring slavery and groups opposing it, that attempted to give something to both sides. The south gained by the strengthening of the fugitive slave law, the north gained a new free state, California. Texas lost territory but was compensated with 10 million dollars to pay for its debt. Slave trade was prohibited in Washington DC, but slavery was not.

8 0

3 years ago

How did the foreign-born population become a major factor in american political life between 1820 and 1850? Who considered this

natita [175]

In the United States immigrant communities became a larger political influence in the early 19th century because of their dramatically increasing numbers. There were a large number of Irish and German immigrants coming to the US at this time due to famine in Ireland and political persecution in Germany. In response to the large influx of immigrants and their potential to influence the political system different groups of Americans took on anti-immigrant or "nativist" views, being strongly against the influx of immigrants and feared that these new immigrants would take their jobs. In response the Know-Nothing Party was formed to opposed this increased immigration politically.

7 0

2 years ago

What kind of information can a secondary source provide?

marissa [1.9K]

Answer:

Secondary sources provide second-hand information and commentary from other researchers. Examples include journal articles, reviews, and academic books. A secondary source describes, interprets, or synthesizes primary sources.

and

Primary sources provide a first-hand account of an event or time period and are considered to be authoritative. They represent original thinking, reports on discoveries or events, or they can share new information.

In conclusion, Primary and Secondary sources are different because Primary sources are like Anne Franks Diary, which i an autobiography

and a Secondary Source would be a Biography written about her by someone else. It is better to trust Primary sources rather than Secondary sources, Secondary sources are can be right but you never know

Can i please have brainliest though??

7 0

2 years ago

Which was not a cause of the French Revolution?

Juli2301 [7.4K]

A. The dictatorship of napoleon bonaparte. This event occurred a while after the french revolution, but the rest, however, are certainly true. :)

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

He was elected Governor of Georgia in 2002 and 2006, becoming the first Republican Governor since the Reconstruction Era.

liraira [26]

The Correct Answer is Perdue.