The answer that is not true is A: "Scott could only sue in state courts."
Whether Dred Scott, as a slave, had any legal right to sue in court was a matter that applied whether talking about state or federal courts. When Scott's suit was rejected by a state of Missouri court, Scott and his supporters managed to bring the case into a federal court, and it went all the way to the Supreme Court. Though the Supreme Court at the time ruled that Scott had no right to bring the suit because he was a slave and not a citizen (point D above), the case gave Chief Justice Roger Taney opportunity to make further statements regarding the slavery issue, including points B and C in your list above.
Answer:
The answer is that In several ways, the Fourteenth Amendment shifted the balance of power from the states to the federal government. Section 1 of the amendment says, “No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States.”
Explanation:
Both national and state governments
From what I researched it would be the communist side that the Soviet Union supported
I believe the correct answer is choice C. To promote competition among businesses.
provides further clarification and substance to the Sherman Antitrust Act<span> of 1890 on topics such as price discrimination, price fixing, and unfair business practices.
</span>They tried to stop anticompetitive practices.
I hope this helps you and have a great day!! :)
